Thursday 19th October 2006, writes Maurice Tebbutt, saw the grand re-opening of all the rights of way across the former Chelveston Airfield site. Over twenty people gathered at the south gate at noon. There were two horses (with their riders), a couple of cyclists, some local residents, members of Higham Ferrers Footpath Group, the Ramblers’ Association, and Ramblers from Bedfordshire.
Ramblers, riders and cyclists gather at the at the south gate
After short addresses by the Chairman of Northamptonshire Area Ramblers and the Chairman of Higham Ferrers Footpath Group, followed by several press photos, the group set off to walk and ride each of the restored routes on the airfield.
They had no difficulty in doing this, because every bridleway and footpath across the old airfield is fenced on each side. At the entrance to the area bridle-gates and hand-gates have been newly erected at the points where each right of way enters.
The fences are steel mesh, 6 feet high. You can see through them but there is, nevertheless, a feeling of confinement. What should be a wonderful open area, with uninterrupted vistas over a wide lonely part of the countryside, is thus reduced.
You may wonder why the fences are there at all. It is because the new owner, a businessman, insisted on them. When he purchased the land from the MoD, who had acquired the area in 1940 for an airfield, he wanted all rights of way across the airfield to be extinguished. The County Councils tamely issued temporary closure orders. Eventually, they insisted on the paths re-opening but had to accept the fencing, at the owner’s expense.
Thanks are due to the staff responsible at Northants and Beds County Councils for their tenacity in achieving the re-opening of the paths. We also thank Defence Estates (MoD) for dedicating the airfield paths, and the Carr family (farmers) for dedicating paths to link the airfield with Chelveston-cum-Caldecott village.
And so we walked, the wind whistling through the wires of the fences on a blustery sunny day in October.
This is not the end of the story. There is now the threat of a wind farm as well as a biomass enterprise served by 40 lorries a day, with rumours of further industrialisation of the site. It is said that the owner will request closure or diversion of the newly restored routes.
Ramblers will oppose any such applications strongly as will many local people:
|