|
Pidgins, Creoles and Acculturation |
Characteristics of Pidgins
'stripped of
everything but the bare essentials necessary for communication'
plural "'s 85%
irregular past 65%
progressive "ing" 58%
possessive "'s" 9%
regular past 7%
inversion 5%
1 2
3
4 5
6 7
Research summary: Schumann, J. (1978a), The Pidginisation
Process: A Model for Second Language Acquisition, Rowley MA, Newbury
House
Aim: to test whether L2 learning was similar to
pidginisation
Learners: essentially Alberto, a 33 year old Costa Rican
polisher
Data type: observational data from spontaneous
conversations and elicited material over a ten month period, taken from Cancino
et al six learner study
Aspects of language: syntactic structures
related to the auxiliary, in particular negation, inversion, the possessive and
plural "'s" forms, the past tense, and the progressive "-ing".
Method of
analysis: scoring of percentage success for supplying forms related to the
auxiliary in obligatory contexts
Results: Alberto was unsuccessful
with negative placement, question inversion, supplying grammatical morphemes
apart from plural "s", auxiliaries apart from "can"
Conclusions: 'In
general Alberto can be characterised as using a reduced and simplified form of
English' (Schumann, 1978a, p.65), resembling pidgins
auxiliaries
forms of copula "be"
over 80%: "can" 85% 70/83
"are" (1pl) 100% 3/3
"were" (2) 100% 2/2
"am" 98% 63/64
"is" 94%
969/1035
10%-80%: "am" 75% 3/4 "was" (1sing) 67% 4/6
"is" 71% 45/63
"are" (2pl) 52% 13/25
"will" 38% 17/47 "were" (3pl) 33% 1/3
"do"
35% 96/277 "are" (3pl) 29% 23/78
"are" (3pl) 22% 5/27
under 10%
"would" 8% 1/13 "was" (3sing) 6% 2/34
"does" 1% 1/75
"did" 1%
1/90
"was" 0% 0/3
"could" 0% 0/3
"have" 0% 0/3
"has" 0%
0/3
Occurrence of auxiliaries and copula
"be" in Alberto's speech (adapted from Schumann, 1978, p.59,
p.62)
Similarities
between Alberto's speech and pidgins (Andersen,
1981)
- pidgin speakers also
have a "no V" rule for negation; 'Alberto as second language learner is a
pidginised negator' (Schumann, 1978, p.182)
- Bickerton's data show pidgin
speakers also lack inversion of subject and verb
- the more pidgin speakers
'that use each morpheme, the higher the percentage of correct use for Alberto'
(Schumann, 1978, p.187)
- while Alberto expresses possession through word
order like pidgin speakers rather than with "'s", he transfers Spanish word
order to English – "food king" rather than "the king's food"
Andersen (1981)
interprets Alberto's frequent use of "need" as the pidgin-like use of a
preverbal marker.
Social distance
- dominance - integration - enclosure
-
other factors: cohesiveness of the group, similarity between the two
cultures, attitudes of the two groups to each other, intended length of
residence of the learners in the country.
Characteristics of creoles (e.g.s from Hawaiian Pidgin English)
a creole is a pidgin that acquires native speakers
- putting
focussed constituents at the beginning – "O, dat wan ai si" (Oh, that one
I saw);
- a uniform article system with three possibilities (specific,
nonspecific, zero)
–"Dag smart" (the dog is smart);
- use of
preverbal markers such as "stei" to indicate tense, mood, and aspect – "Wail
wi stei paedl, jaen stei put wata insai da kanu" (while we were paddling,
John was letting water into the canoe)
References
Schumann, J. (1978), The Pidginisation Process: A Model for Second Language Acquisition, Rowley MA, Newbury House
Bickerton, D. (1984), 'The language bioprogram hypothesis and second language acquisition', in Rutherford, W.E. (ed.), Language Universals and Second Language Acquisition, Amsterdam, John Benjamins
***************************
Activity
Here are some of the sentences spoken by Schumann's subject Alberto that contain negatives, interrogatives and declaratives. Looking at the criteria for pidgins, to what extent do you think that these support Schumann's contention that Alberto is a pidginised speaker?
Negatives
I don't
understand that.
I don't have much time.
I don't have the
car.
I don't understand.
You don't understand me.
No
like walk.
I no understand.
That "learn" no understand.
No
remember.
No have pronunciation.
No understand all.
No is
mine.
I no may explain to you.
No pass.
Interrogatives
What is
surance?
This is
apple?
You may
change the day, the lesson the day?
You will come
back?
You will
come here the next Monday?
Declaratives
This picture is 'On the Point'
It's
problem for me.
Picture is very dark.
In my country is six year in
primaria.
Is necessary.
Is very bad, no?
This man is wrong
