"The men and women of our armed forces
put their lives on the line everyday to preserve and safeguard the freedoms
that all Americans cherish and enjoy. Absent an informed consent or
presidential waiver, the United States cannot demand that members of the
armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs" Judge
Emmet Sullivan, December 22, 2003
Flashback to Perth, Western Australia, January 12,
French Prove Gulf War Syndrome Caused by
years ago before gaining access to the Internet, I wrote a report about the
most likely causes of Gulf War Syndrome. The report slowly moved around the
world by snail mail, and was eventually published in four small magazines.
Then I forgot all about the report for a few years, because the nightmare
symptoms being suffered by Gulf War veterans in America and Britain, seemed
light years away from my sleepy little backwater in Western Australia.
before George W. Bush decided to do the whole thing all over again, in his
increasingly frantic and very public attempts to pillage Middle East oil for
Wall Street. Though I am obviously powerless to prevent Bush from ruthlessly
sacrificing American lives in the Iraqi desert, I can at least sound a
warning designed to minimize the physical and psychological impact on
servicemen before they leave for the Gulf, and after they hopefully return.
no doubt that the panic generated by the false “War on Terror” is
already being used to coerce people into accepting “preventative medical
treatment”, that in a more sane world they would instantly refuse. Most
profitable by far for the pharmaceutical multinationals backing the Bush
Dynasty, are inoculations forced onto service men and women by legislation.
Taking the dreaded “Anthrax Shots” as an example, the manufacturer makes
a net profit of $18.00 out of every single individual, a figure that has to
be multiplied by 2.4 million to get a true feel for multinational profit
It is a
harsh fact that the Anthrax vaccine being forcibly administered to service
men and women today, is the same as that included in the deadly Gulf War
“cocktail” inoculations of 1990-1991. This has no meaning whatever for
politicians who habitually bend forward over a desk when their masters
approach from behind, but it might have some meaning for you. In the event
that the multinationals manage to spark a “civil emergency” somewhere
near your own home, be advised that you too will be forced to accept exactly
the same untested but hugely profitable vaccine as military personnel bound
for the Persian Gulf.
direct relationship between the Anthrax shots of today and the
“cocktail” of yesterday is deeply troubling, and is the prime reason for
reviving, editing, and adding to this 1995 report. You might find part of
the text disturbing, which is probably a very good thing. It is difficult to
protect your family from government-induced harm if you are not completely
late 1995, devastating new evidence on Gulf War Syndrome was released,
providing undeniable hard scientific proof for those who have long suspected
that Gulf veterans are suffering short and long-term effects of unproven
anti-bacteriological warfare inoculations and anti-nerve gas tablets,
forcibly administered by U.S. Army doctors in Saudi Arabia.
thousands of U.S. veterans suffering from Gulf War Syndrome, it came as no
surprise to learn in October 1995 that several hundred British veterans were
suffering in the same way, with three to five new cases being reported every
week. Like their U.S. counterparts, most were puzzled by the origins of the
disease, which they initially attributed to oil-laden smoke in Kuwait, toxic
dust from depleted uranium rounds fired by U.S. weapons, and possible
contamination from expended Iraqi chemical shells in the area, fired before
the Gulf War commenced.
startling break with tradition, one British military doctor stated that in
her view, 99% of the problems could be sourced back to the
anti-bacteriological warfare "cocktail" inoculations, and
anti-nerve gas tablets forcibly administered to military personnel in the
Gulf region at that time. In an October 1995 broadcast of the ITN TV World
News from London, she further explained that all British military personnel
had been provided with the same untested and unproven drugs as the
Americans, from U.S. medical sources. To reinforce the point, the doctor
explained that the number of British personnel suffering symptoms correlated
exactly on a per capita basis with U.S. personnel. It was a controversial
claim, but apparently lacking in substance.
Shattering confirmation came eleven hours later, when Australian Channel 10
television carried exactly the same story at 5 p.m., but with an extra piece
tagged onto the end. The extra piece claimed that French military personnel
in the Gulf region, numbering the same as the British contingent, had been
prevented from taking the "cocktails" and tablets on the direct
orders of the French Commander-in-Chief. The story claimed that since the
end of the Gulf War, not a single member of the French military has suffered
from Gulf War Syndrome, or reported any of its symptoms. One hour later at 6
p.m. when the other Australian television networks ran their news
broadcasts, the awesome story with its stunning proof had vanished from
sight. Nor was it reported in the Australian newspapers.
scientist or veteran, the fact that the French should be completely clear of
Gulf War Syndrome while the Americans and British suffered huge numbers of
cases verified on a direct per capita basis, has huge and horrifying
implications. After all, the French ate the same food, drank the same water,
breathed the same air and trudged through hundreds of miles of the same
desert. They also fired similar weapons at similar targets.
were the additional factors that made the French unique in their ability to
completely withstand the deadly Gulf War Syndrome? The truth is there were
none at all, save for the experimental American "cocktail"
inoculations and nerve gas tablets. What the French had done, almost by
accident, was provide hard scientific proof of the direct cause of Gulf War
Syndrome. This proof took the form of its large 25,000-strong contingent of
French servicemen participating n the Gulf War, who in all respects
constituted a valid medical “control group”.
uninitiated, here is an example of how a “control group” might be used
in medical trials: Let us say that the manufacturer of a new “chest
hair” drug wants to run a clinical trial to check its efficiency, using
500,000 men. Out of this total, 475,000 [Americans and Brits] are given the
real “chest hair” pill, while the remaining 25,000 [French] are used as
a control group and given only a placebo, i.e. an identical looking
sugar-coated pill with no active ingredients. If at the end of the trial all
men with enhanced chest hair were found in the main group, with not a single
case in the control group, the new “chest hair” drug would immediately
be approved by medical authorities. It really is that simple. Applying the
same process in reverse, proves in definitive medical terms that untested
Anthrax and botulism potions kill far more servicemen than enemy gunfire.
attempt to confirm this vital though very short-lived Gulf War Syndrome
data, the author contacted the French Military Attaché in Australia and
inquired if it was correct that the French Commander-in-Chief forbade his
own personnel the untested substances. The Military Attaché was happy to
confirm this, and also confirmed that not one French soldier or airman has
suffered since the end of the Gulf War. It seemed to be a subject of which
he was very proud, and rightly so. Perhaps it is time for U.S. and British
veterans to confirm the same points with their local French consulates,
before taking a very hefty legal swing at their own governments.”
3 October 1996, nine months after this report was first published in two
small American magazines, and then brought to the attention of the White
House, the prestigious New York Times suddenly added a new dimension [and
thus a possible new cause for Gulf War Syndrome]. According to the
newspaper, an Iraqi chemical weapons dump at Kamisiyah was bombed
extensively by U.S. jets before the ground campaign, meaning soldiers could
have been exposed before their assault. The New York Times did not attempt
to explain why this news was being reported five years after the event, nor
why it was suddenly so important to bring the matter to the attention of the
again, affected veterans and the public settled down into a confused
silence, their suspicions blunted by media-induced patriotic guilt. How dare
they even imagine that caring American pharmaceutical multinationals would
hurt them or their families, when all along the real culprit was obviously
Saddam Hussein and his evil “weapons of mass destruction”? The Kamisiyah
“link” to Gulf War Syndrome was ruthlessly exploited, with official
Pentagon confirmation that the dump itself was finally destroyed on 4 March
1991 by the 37th Engineering Battalion, who “did not know” that nerve
gas was stored there when they triggered the demolition charges. So, victims
and public alike were coaxed into believing that American and other troops
located downwind of the demolition, had been affected solely by “Iraqi”
truly brilliant media propaganda, but failed to take into account those
incredibly annoying Frenchmen, who seemed to be everywhere in southern Iraq
at the same time as the Americans and British. Proportionately speaking, the
same number of “French Control Group” troops were present when Kamisiyah
was bombed and finally demolished, but not one of them suffered or even
reported any of the effects of “Gulf War Syndrome”. And before you ask,
yes, the French did indeed trudge wearily through the same areas of southern
Iraq littered with depleted uranium 238 as the Americans and British. But
still there is absolutely no trace of Gulf War Syndrome in any French
not take a rocket scientist to work out where this report is heading. Just
look at the hard facts and ignore the pathetic lobby, media, and academic
hype. As already discussed, all coalition troops regardless of nationality
shared the same air and water, they all walked or drove over the same
terrain, and they all used similar weapons against similar targets. But what
about external body protection? Did the French have vastly superior
biowarfare suits that somehow magically gave them “the edge” over
American and British personnel? No, they did not. The biowarfare suits worn
by the French, came from exactly the same stock as those worn by the
Americans and British. The only variables left at this point in the report,
are the untrialled “cocktail” inoculations and the nerve gas tablets.
heavy media pressure in late October 2000, the retired commander of French
forces in the Gulf, General Michel Roquejoffre, admitted that his men were
in fact ordered to take nerve gas tablets [pyridostigmine bromide] during
the Gulf War, but only for four days when mistakenly believed to be under
direct chemical attack. The General pointed out that this four days of
intermittent French exposure to nerve gas tablets, contrasts sharply with
their continuous use for months on end by American and British servicemen.
However, General Roquejoffre emphasized that at no time did he allow any
French serviceman to receive the highly controversial untrialled American
than help the media in its never-ending quest to lay misleading smoke
screens around the true origins of Gulf War Syndrome, General Roquejoffre
appears to have used his statement to finally isolate and expose the real
villain behind the debilitating and sometimes lethal disease. Having
“admitted” that some of his troops took the nerve gas tablets during the
Gulf War, General Roquejoffre has wittingly or unwittingly removed the nerve
gas tablet variable, leaving only the lethal American “cocktail”
inoculation, which included the untested Anthrax vaccine being irresponsibly
peddled today by assorted western politicians, as the sole and
scientifically proven cause of Gulf War Syndrome.
Portsmouth, England, January 25, 2003
British Servicemen Throw Deadly Anthrax Vaccine Overboard!
On 4 January 2003 a confidential copy of my updated report on the single
cause of Gulf War Syndrome was sent directly to a number of military
computer servers in America, Britain and Australia. With servicemen already
being ordered to submit to a debilitating or lethal dose of untrialled and
unproven Anthrax "vaccine" directly linked to GWS, it seemed wise
to ensure that they saw the work before it was officially posted on the
Internet. Web sites can be attacked all too easily, and a number of mine
have been totally destroyed in the last six months.
after Prime Minister Tony Blair arrogantly waved goodbye to 30,000 British
servicemen departing England for the Persian Gulf aboard a fleet of Navy
vessels, locals in Dorset and Devon started reporting a very strange
of [unused] vials of Anthrax Vaccine started washing up on their beaches.
Some locals started panickng, thinking that perhaps they were being attacked
by a country or countries known to have vast stockpiles of this ruthless
killer - most notably America and Israel. But their heart rates came down
again when Health Departmernt officials visited the areas and explained the
thousands of vials on the beaches were in fact "cures in bottles".
Jim Moore, a spokesman for the National Gulf Veterans and Families
Association (NGVFA), said his organization has no conclusive proof
that the vaccine vials that washed up in Dorset, southern England, were
thrown overboard. But Moore noted that the circumstances surrounding the
vaccine find are suspicious.
anything to be accidentally washed overboard on an aircraft carrier is
highly unusual," he said. "This gives us cause for concern and
there are a lot of questions that need to be asked."
organization said it has heard anecdotal evidence of mistiming of vaccines
from current service personnel. The NGVFA believes that improperly
administered vaccines might be one of the causes behind "Gulf War
Syndrome," a mysterious collection of symptoms that is thought to
afflict tens of thousands of veterans in Britain and the United States.
"People say you accept the risks when you sign up to join the
forces," Moore said. "That's true, but the risk you accept is one
of an enemy bullet or a landmine. You don't accept the risk of being a
guinea pig for a vaccine, All the mistakes made in the Gulf War are being
Ministry of Defense spokeswoman, speaking on condition of anonymity, said
that an internal investigation into the vaccine find was underway."We
wouldn't like to speculate on where the vaccine might have come from at this
stage," she said. "There has been a large amount of speculation in
the press and this isn't helpful. The investigation will uncover the source
of the vaccine."
Peering judiciously behind the official veil, of course reveals that the
only sources for the thousands of "shipwrecked" Anthrax vaccine
vials were the various naval vessels that had earlier sailed reluctantly for
the Persian Gulf on direct political orders.
British servicemen have found a way to neutralize the second most deadly
danger to their lives. Now all they have to do, is to figure out a way to
neutralize the most clear and present danger ever to threaten their families
and themselves: Prime MinisterTony Blair
District of Columbia, United States of America,
December 22, 2003
Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan Issues Temporary Injunction Against The Use
of Anthrax Vaccine
a landmark 34-page ruling on Civil Action No. 03-707 (EGS) in the District
Court of Columbia, Federal Judge Sullivan has enjoined defendents Donald H.
Rumsfeld et al from inoculating members of the American armed
services with Anthrax vaccine, without their prior written consent.
Sullivan's decision hinged on the fact that Congress, after the 1991 Persian
Gulf War, passed a law banning the use of experimental drugs on military
personnel without their informed consent.
case was filed in April by "John Does" - reportedly, three
military personnel and three government contractors who objected to the
vaccine. There is little doubt they had good reason to do so. Claims of
"safety" by the pharmaceutical manufacturers are negated by court
documents, which prove that instead of the "0.2 percent side-effect
rate" claimed on advisory brochures supplied to servicemen and
women embarking on active duty, actual adverse reaction rates vary between
5.0 percent and a staggering 35.0 percent.
There is no way the extremely profitable pharmaceutical multinationals can
dodge this one. At best, serious risks to service personnel are twenty-five
times higher than 'advised' in writing, and at worst they are one hundred
and seventy-five times higher than they 'advised' in writing. It is
reasonable to ask who is going to pick up the health care costs of the
[median] 40,000+ American service personnel who will suffer severe
disabililty at some time in the future, because of this blatant deception
and forced Anthrax inoculation program.
Most importantly, Judge Sullivan wrote, ""The men and women of our
armed forces put their lives on the line everyday to preserve and safeguard
the freedoms that all Americans cherish and enjoy. Absent an informed
consent or presidential waiver, the United States cannot demand that members
of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs."
this juncture in history it is wise to ask whether obscene pharmaceutical
profits for 'shareholders' was the only reason for forcing these
debilitating inoculations on healthy young American service personnel. After
all, by its own actions banning the use of experimental vaccines in 1991,
Congress tacitly admitted that the Gulf War "Cocktail"
inoculations were in large part responsible for Gulf War Syndrome.
proof of this is simple. Despite deliberately misleading and confusing media
claims that the main culprit for GWS was depleted uranium, American forces
still carry and fire this noxious substance by the ton. Congress did
not pass a law limiting the carriage and use of depleted uranium to those
with "informed consent", nor at any time did Congress blame GWS on
Iraq's "Weapons of Mass Destruction", which we now know do not
exist. The "Cocktail" inoculations were the only possible
candidates, and were banned by law.
problem lies in the fact that Congress does not promulgate orders for the
U.S. Military. This important task is eagerly carried out by crazed neocons
including Cheney, Wolfowitz and Perle, none of whom have substantial share
holding in the pharmaceutical multinationals, and all of whom know the side
and long-term effects of both the Gulf War cocktails and Anthrax vaccine.
therefore dictates that there must be another, more compelling reason to
cripple very large numbers of the American military. There certainly is, and
the real reason for this pre-meditated grevious bodily harm and
manslaughter, will be fully explained in Part Two of "Fortress
Americas", due to be published late December or early January.