|
5th May 2002
I am the first to admit there are certain advantages
to living where I do. There is, of course, the glorious sunshine,
the palm trees and the 7 hours a week I have to work. But
it is not good for everything. For example, were I hypothetically
to want to watch the FA Cup final, I would have to overcome
some serious obstacles. The mathematicians among you may be
able to work out that due to the 8 hour time difference, games
starting at 3pm somewhere in Cardiff would start at 7am here.
Those among you with an interest in the heady world of broadcasting
rights may also know that this years Cup Final was not shown
on cable here without shelling out some further cash in advance.
The thought has just occurred to me that we could actually
have called up and got the pay-per-view, but that appears
to have been well beyond our cognitive capacities at the time.
Our small band of ex-patriots vigorously debated the various
options
available. Someone even suggested driving up to San Francisco
to watch the
game live at 7am on a Saturday morning. The plus side of this
would be that
we could then spend the entire day in the pub. The down side
would be that
we would then spend the entire day in the pub. Then someone
pointed out that
it would mean getting up at 5:30am Saturday morning and the
plan was
abandoned.
We eventually decided to watch a replay of the game at midday
at a local English pub. The building had apparently been dismantled
and shipped over from England in the early 80's. The wallpaper
was testament to the truth of this claim. A new challenge
now awaited us. How far through the game could we get without
finding out who'd won? Somewhat unsurprisingly, anyone guessing
a number of minutes greater than zero would have been wildly
optimistic. We have partly ourselves to blame, as one person
was wearing an Arsenal top. As soon as we came into view of
the group in the beer garden, a fat bloke in an Arsenal top
stood up and started cheering. A skinny bloke in a Chelsea
top swore quietly into his beer. My training in psychology
goes only so far, but I think it's fair to say that as we
walked in we had a fair inkling of who'd won (though I can't
speak for the guy in the geography department).
Now the quest was how far through the game we could get before
finding out the score. On this matter, we were benefited by
the barmaid helpfully telling the drunken fools outside that
we didn't know the score. So we got stuck into breakfast as
the game started, stopping eating only to stare at the occasional
appearance of an Arsenal top in the bar, desperately hoping
that they he say anything as he looked at the screen, and
breathing a silent sigh of relief as he walked outside with
beer in hand. But it's never wise to trust people to not be
pricks. Especially when they are. In fairness, it wasn't the
guy in the Arsenal shirt that caused the problem - although
it was him who revealed what the score was. We slyly deduced
it when he walked into the bar in the 66th minute shouting
"2-0 to the Arsenal!"
Pretty damn irritating I grant you, but he was drunk and
he was deeply apologetic when he realised his mistake. Getting
to the 66th minute wasn't bad. The real Chieftain of Prickville
was his friend who I can only imagine must have been christened
Dilbert Doofus Dwibley the third. As Arsenal Shirt is apologizing,
Dilbert looks at the screen and says, "2 goals to go!"
Now I ask you, why would anybody say that? Not only is it
a sentence that ends with an exclamation mark, it is in this
case a totally redundant one. My less diplomatic friend from
Newcastle communicated his annoyance, which Dilbert either
didn't hear or ignored.
A few minutes later Parlour had scored his goal. Watching
the replay, Arsenal Shirt comments to us something about the
swerve on the ball. "Yes" pipes up Dilbert,
"Ljunberg's goal was kind of similar". At this point,
it's too much for my friend from Newcastle. He gets up, grabs
his beer and glasses our last surviving relic of the aristocracy.
Relieved as I was, I was a little concerned about the possible
legal and personal ramifications such an action might have
for my friend. I needn't have worried. It turns out that as
the pub had been shipped over from England, it was technically
British land. And we simply had to remind the State police
of the 1976 bill making the glassing of dickheads in pubs
compulsory. We may have been pissed (off), but at least Dilbert
has 13 stitches and vision in one eye.
|