| MICROPHONES and RECORDERS | |
| Olympus DS-40 Audio recorder and player | |
|
This Olympus recorder, at the highest quality
setting, saves files in WMA format at 128kbps with a sampling frequency
of 44.1 kHz, and has a frequency response of 50 to 19kHz. It will play
WMA and MP3 files, has a 512MB memory, and has a small speaker on the back of the unit. This is a neat, good quality product. The recorder has a plug-in stereo microphone which is pictured here. The mis are fed 2 volts from the recorder, via the jack plug. This microphone has a fairly limited low frequency response. The low frequency roll-off of this microphone is similar to that obtainable with the selectable low frequency cut option on the recorder. A particular colouration in the sound of this microphone (characterised by a strong response to sibilants) is the result of the casing and the internal positioning of the electret capsules. This colouration disappears when the casing is removed. Perhaps the designers have deliberately engineered a particular response to emphasise voice characteristics. The casing is effective in reducing wind noise. The microphone setup is shown here,
with, and without the casing. The circuit board has been moved a little
out of its locating guides. There appears to be a simple parallel RC
network across the microphone positive and ground. The capsules are
set at 90° to each other and the microphone can be pionted towards
a sound source whilst retaining some stereo separation. Sample recording: Sounds
in the garden with a light breeze I have replaced the inbuilt mono microphone with a Panasonic WM-61A capsule. This capsule is the same 6mm diameter as the original, and slightly deeper. The original capsule was a 'CZ034F' and seems very similar to the Panasonic WM-62A. This new capsule is more sensitive, and has a lower noise figure. I found that the capsule position does not correspond well with the aperture on the top of the recorder casing (see animation, left). This mismatch spoils the sound, and transmits too much case handling noise to the microphone. The animation here shows the offset. The magenta dot indicates the approximate position and size of the aperture of the capsule. I have since made a small modification to the top plate to make an easier path for sound reaching the mic. |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
|
|||||||||
| Home constructed stereo T-mic May 2007 |
I designed and built this microphone specifically for the Olympus recorder shown above. I wanted to use this in place of the Olympus mic because its plastic casing causes over-emphasis at certain frequencies. My microphone uses two directional Panasonic WM-55a electret capsules. The mass of these capsules is low and I took particular care to support the capsules very lightly in order to minimise handling noise. The capsules in this design face 180° apart from each other, and so there is the maximum of stereo separation. The steel mesh is fairly light, but should be adequate if the microphone is handled with care. It is backed with the black fibrous paper-like material commonly found in microphones. The body is constructed from nickel plated brass tubing. Small rubber lugs were added to locate with the depressions in the top of the Olympus recorder, to ensure correct alignment when plugged into the recorder. The 3.5mm plug is offset on the body to align with the position of the mic socket on the Olympus recorder. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Home
constructed stereo microphone |
|---|
![]() |
|||
|
This microphone employs two 6mm diameter Panasonic WM-61A omni directional electret capsules fitted into each end of a 390mm aluminium tube. The capsules are very sensitive, and have a fairly low noise figure. To reduce resonance, the tube is packed with putty. The rubber rings on the tube help to locate foam windshields (shown right), and are beneficial when laying the microphone down. The design relies on powering from a recorder. Handling noise is acceptably low, and the microphone produce a nice quality of sound. |
![]() |
|
|
|||
The stereo image is created by the differential between the outputs of the two capsules. Amplitude differences arise from the capsules' mild directional characteristics at higher frequencies, and from the relative proximity of sound sources. Phase differences occur where sound waves experience a time difference in reaching each capsule. The degree of phase shift is determined by the spacing of the capsules and the sound's angle of approach. This design provides a sense of spaciousness - best reproduced with earphones - which the T mic design shown above does not. |
|||
| Outdoor microphones, good for birdsong and ambient noise from the great outdoors | |
I have set two Panasonic WM-61A electret microphone capsules into the wall of my house. The front of the capsules is more or less level with the surface of the walls, and held in place with soft putty. The capsules are tiny, so I did not need to drill much of a hole. I covered them with metal mesh and foam earpads from earphones, and this offers some protection from wind and the elements in general. I'm not sure just how well these capsules stand up to moisture, but I've had them there for a while now, and they're still working fine. They are very sensitive, low noise and give a high output. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The capsules are set about 1ft apart, on adjacent walls, and this provides excellent stereo sound. There is the time / phase difference in the signals from each capsule arising from the spacing between them. In addition, the positioning lends directional properties to the capsules because of the shielding effect of the corner of the building. Unlike more exposed elements, wind noise is not a great problem in this setup. |
|
Microphone self-noise and
sensitivity
|
The Panasonic WM-61A capsules have a S/N ratio of 62dB. I have experimented using these capsules with the Sharp MD-MS200 minidisc recorder and the Ripflash Pro recorder, and the results are very similar to the Olympus DS-40 in terms of noise when recording low level sounds. The capsules work well with the Olympus. The combination is highly sensitive (too high at times) and the overall noise level is low enough for recording low level sounds. The above recorders cannot take full advantage of a very low noise microphone unless it also has a high output. One would need a very low noise preamp in order to take full advantage of a very low noise microphone. The Panasonic WM-55A capsules that I used for the T mic design (shown above) have a quoted noise figure close to that of the WM-61A, but they have a lower sensitivity figure of -47dB. They produce a recording which seems poorer in terms of noise than when using the WM-61A capsule. Interesting
material on using electret mics in parallel to increase output level and
improve S/N ratio |
Microphone
Preamp Design December 2004 |
|
|---|---|
I needed a very
small preamp which would operate from low voltage small batteries. I found
nothing suitable available commercially, so I had to set about designing
and building a preamp device myself. I wanted to use this in conjunction
with a small digital audio recorder which had no microphone input. This
unit was designed for use in conjunction with the Ripflash Plus.
That recorder was capable of making high quality recordings at up to 224kb/s
at a 44kHz sampling rate using the line input. I no longer have that recorder,
and I replaced it with the Ripflash Pro (or DCube / Nextway 310),
which, again, has only a line input. Right, my preamp design: the unit used in-line, and the preamp during construction. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
Left,
a circuit design by Texas Instruments. I used the TLV2461, which is
the same,, but with no low power shutdown option. |
|
| Panasonic NV-GS60 camcorder ZOOM MICROPHONE December 2008 | ||
The Panasonic
literature describes this as a 'zoom mic'. It is said to follow the zoom
lens in its angle of acceptance. This is a stereo microphone which appears
to change its character to a mono cardioid pattern as the focal length
of the lens increases. There seems to also be a general increase in sensitivity
- at least in the forward direction, as the lens zooms forward. I would think that the effect is produced electronically,
rather than any physical or mechanical change to the microphone capsules
setup. I imagine the mono cardioid effect is got by comparing the phase
and amplitude of signals from the left and right microphones, and filtering
out signals which are different. Sounds from dead ahead will be identical
in each channel, and these can be extracted. I
have come across an integrated circuit designed for camcorder microphones. I am curious about how the camcorder creates a directional stereo signal with microphone capsules set into the case as the picture shows. I don't want to start opening up the camera - it's too new. I am tempted, however, because I would like to create a connection for an external microphone. First impressions are that this mic is fairly effective and sensitive with distant sources. The gain increases at longer focal lengths. Mechanical noise pickup from the motor is very low, and generally the audio quality is very good, although stereo separation is limited. |
![]() |
|
| EM150 Microphone capsule April 2008 |
I await delivery of these capsules from the United States. |
Find this interesting? email haldanes@ntlworld.com |