Newegg Coupons
How Not To Argue 101
Readers need to take note of this warning (originally given on the opening page) before following the links below:
For anyone interested, check out the desperate 'debating' tactics used by Dialectical Mystics in their attempt to respond to my ideas.
You will no doubt notice that the vast majority all say the same sorts of things, and most of them pepper their remarks with scatological and abusive language. And they all like to make things up, too, about me and my beliefs.
25 years (!!) of this from Dialectical Mystics has meant I now take an aggressive stance with them every time -- I soon learnt back in the 1980s that being pleasant with them (my initial tactic) did not alter their abusive tone, their propensity to fabricate, nor reduce the amount of scatological language they used.
So, these days, I generally go for the jugular from the get-go.
Apparently, they expect me to take their abuse lying down, and regularly complain about my "bullying" tactics.
These mystics can dish it out, but clearly they cannot take it.
Given the damage their theory has done to Marxism, and the abuse they all dole out, they are lucky this is all I can do to them.
[Why they do this is explained here.]
[DM = Dialectical Materialism; NON = Negation of the Negation.]
RevLeft
RevLeft.com -> What Is Dialectics?
RevLeft.com -> Contradictions In Society
RevLeft.com -> Objective Truth
RevLeft.com -> Dialectical Materialism -- Does It Work?
RevLeft.com -> The Dialectical Method
RevLeft.com -> Marx And Contradiction
RevLeft.com -> Dialectical And Historical Materialism
RevLeft.com -> New Materialism?
RevLeft.com -> Is Abstraction Valid?
RevLeft.com -> What Is Contradiction?
RevLeft.com -> Scrapping Dialectics -- What Would Be Lost?
RevLeft.com -> The Only Law Of Dialectics?
RevLeft.com -> A Question To Rosa
RevLeft.com -> Did Mao Reject The NON?
RevLeft.com -> 'Hegelian' Triad
RevLeft.com -> Did Lenin Believe In Santa Claus?
RevLeft.com -> A Question On Totality
RevLeft.com -> Do All Things Have An Opposite?
RevLeft.com -> Materialism Without Dialectics
RevLeft.com -> Stalin And Quantity Into Quality
RevLeft.com -> DM Gives A Scientific View
RevLeft.com -> Quantity Into Quality, Again
RevLeft.com -> The Revolutionary Dialectic
RevLeft.com -> Dialectics for Dummies
RevLeft.com -> Dialectics 'Made Easy'
RevLeft.com -> Stalin on Materialism
RevLeft.com -> Quantity and Quality
RevLeft.com-> Dialectics for Kids
RevLeft.com -> Where is the Mysticism?
RevLeft.com -> DM: A Total Screw-Up
RevLeft.com -> @nti-dialectics Made Easy
RevLeft.com -> Beyond Anti-dialectics... Anti-materialism
RevLeft.com -> Dialectics: A Deep Mystery even to Dialecticians
RevLeft.com -> Spot the Difference
RevLeft.com -> Can Light-Bulbs Change Themselves?
RevLeft.com -> The Opiate of the Party
RevLeft.com -> Dialectical Materialism
RevLeft.com -> More Fun with Hegel!
RevLeft.com -> Dialectical Materialism
RevLeft.com -> Dialectical Materialism 01
RevLeft.com -> The Dialecticians' Dilemma
RevLeft.com -> Diabolical Logic Bites the Dust
RevLeft.com -> DM: A Total Screw-Up
RevLeft.com -> The Mystical Origins of Hegel's Thought
RevLeft.com -> Lenin Refutes Mechanics
RevLeft.com -> Dialectics: Full of Holes
RevLeft.com -> How Karl Marx Almost Escaped
RevLeft.com -> Undialectical 'Nodal' Points
RevLeft.com -> Formal Logic and Change
RevLeft.com -> Dialectics
RevLeft.com -> Forces and 'Contradictions'
RevLeft.com -> Anti-dialectic Dialectic
RevLeft.com -> Eastern Logic/Dialectics vs. Aristotelian Logic
RevLeft.com -> Modern Hegelians
RevLeft.com -> Hegel's Curse:
RevLeft.com -> Dialectics Explained
RevLeft.com -> Idealism vs Materialism
RevLeft.com -> Dialetheism
RevLeft.com -> On Contradiction (by Mao Tse-tung)
Other Sites
http://discussion.newyouth.com/index.php?topic=2137.0
http://discussion.newyouth.com/index.php?topic=1441.15
A particularly good example of just how unreasonable DM-fans are can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pazouzou
Another excellent example is the following:
http://haloscan.com/tb/lenin/116999673173635740
In the above, check out the increasingly irrational tone of 'Mr G' -- a comrade I agree with 99.9% of the time over other issues, as he knows --, but yet he cannot stomach having the sacred 'dialectic' comprehensively demolished, so devoted is he to its Hermetic Mysteries.
[His 'arguments' are debunked here, here, here and here.]
A more recent example is this one:
Socialist Unity -> Yet More Dialectical Dunderheads
Readers will no doubt notice that the UK-comrades at the above site are just as capable as their mystical brethren internationally are of pontificating about my ideas without actually having read any of my Essays (examples of such can be found in the RevLeft links above). Even so, they are equally practiced at bluster, abuse and invention -- and of informing the world of the limitations of 'Formal Logic' from a position of total ignorance.
What a wonderful advertisement they are for the deleterious effect this theory has had on otherwise radical minds!
As if this were not enough, there is even more Dialectical Mayhem to be found at the following link:
http://libcom.org/forums/thought/thesis-antithesis-synthesis
[Notice that this is an entirely different Forum, and these are non-Leninist comrades with whom I have never 'debated' before, but they still manage to make the same sorts of points as the mystical misfits above, peppered with the by now regulation-issue abusive remarks, compounded by lies and other diversionary tactics. By any chance, are DM-fans cloned in a factory somewhere?]
Here is the latest example of irrationality:
http://secularhumanism.blogspot.com/2008/02/demystifying-dialectics.html
My replies can be found here.
The first of the above has been reposted here; the ensuing discussion is a mixture of more reasoned responses to some of my ideas inter-mingled with the same old dialectical abuse from others.
In fact, at the latter site, the character who runs the blog at the link above has also tried to 'debate' this with me, but is still quite happy to insult me for no good reason, and make stuff up about me. However, in this case, we encounter a new dialectical dodge -- one I have not seen before -- this character has become so desperate, he even denies I wrote these Essays! How he imagines that neutralises their content, only a professional will be able to tell us.
The other individual with whom I debated this at the above site is almost unique, too, in that 'he' has maintained a comradely respect for me throughout, which I have reciprocated.
And here is another example of the same sort of dialectical dissembling. [Readers are warned that this latter page takes a while to load.]
Yet more invention; yet more abuse. And all based on not having read my Essays! No surprise there, then.
And, just the other day, I discovered this Venezuelan site, where a comrade was quite happy to bad-mouth me even though, as far as I can tell, we have never crossed swords on the internet before. In fact, so desperate has this comrade become, he has even accused me of being a Yankee agent!
Is there a single dialectician on the planet who can defend effectively the "world view of the proletariat"?
And, who can do so without resorting to the usual abusive, irrational and emotional responses?
Latest Update 02/09/08
Hits Since April 12th 2007: