Close this window to return to the site.
Article created 20/Aug/2005.SUSE 9.1 an
alternative to the Windows operating system?
SUSE is a commercial version of Linux, it is designed to
rival Windows, by being easy to use and featuring
applications for just about every computing need, in the
basic installation.
I got my copy of SUSE 9.1 cheap in a book shop sale, this
is because the latest version is 9.3 (Price £64.95), but
if you don't mind using the older version, it is
available on the web, for a few pounds, if you search
around.
SUSE 9.3 comes either on a DVD or five CD's, but the
version 9.1 that I used, came on just one CD. Even so it
still features all the software needed for office work,
surfing the net, music and video playing etc.(Although it
could only play a few of the formats I tried.) It even
has software for playing TV on your computer, if you have
the correct hardware.
The installation is quite straightforward, providing you
use the default settings. If you already have Windows
installed, SUSE will create and resize partitions for the
installation automatically, although it was fairly greedy
about the share of the drive it took.
It is possible to alter most of the installation settings,
but this is quite technical and although setup help files
are available, they are not a lot of ....help! 
I would have liked to have altered the partition setup,
but I wasn't certain as to what was what, so I had to
stay with the defaults and this is despite my having used
partitioning software previously.
Once the installation is under way, your input is not
needed until the very end.
In the documentation it says that the install will take
15 to 30 minutes, well it took a whopping 1 hour and 7
minutes on my computer. You can watch what is happening
during the install if you wish and it didn't seem to have
any problems, it was just slow.
Once installation is over, you restart your computer and
you are given the choice of booting Windows, or SUSE (Default)
during startup, via the excellent boot manager.
I found that SUSE normally took about twice as long as
Windows to start, but once loaded, you are presented with
an attractive desktop, with menu and icons that will be
familiar to any Windows user.
SUSE does work on a single mouse click system rather than
the Windows double click, but this can be changed in the
Control Center if you wish.

SUSE comes with a very
good help file and most basic options are easy to
understand and if you have previously used Windows, you
will hardly need the help to set your preferences and use
the main applications.
An online support service for installation problems, via
email or phone is also available for the first thirty
days after installation.
I used the email support (via my Windows connection), as
I had problems with setting up my modem. Unfortunately
despite a lot of suggestions, nothing seemed to work and
searching on the internet revealed modem problems to be
very common, the best cure seems to be to buy a USB or
serial modem, but not wanting to splash out on a new
modem, when I already have a perfectly good one, I
decided to do without the internet.
While the SUSE menu displays a wide selection of popular
software, there is still more available by using the
console, I think in many ways this is better than Knoppix,
which displays hundreds of software items in its menu,
but a large amount of them are too technical for most of
us to use.
Further software can be easily installed from the
installation CD, it is also possible to install software
from other sources, but despite having used Windows to
download the Linux version of F-Prot as a test
installation, I was unable to figure out from the help
file how to install it.
One of the most surprising things about SUSE was its
speed, it was very slow, even with all the fancy effects
turned off, it still only ran at about half the speed of
Windows. This was strange, as both SUSE and Knoppix use
the Linux system, yet Knoppix when run as a CD from the
hard drive, matched Windows for speed most of the time,
even though it has to unpack all its applications on the
fly.
Stability was good in SUSE, it does still crash, but not
as often as Windows 98se and most of your work is
recovered after a crash.
SUSE seemed very secure, with root privileges needed to
alter any important system settings, which helps protect
against viruses, trojans etc and also stops other users
altering your settings.
A firewall is provided to secure you on the internet,
although having no connection I couldn't try it.
Recommending SUSE is difficult, if everything sets up
properly, it is a good looking, secure, fully featured,
operating system, that needs no external drivers or
software and after the initial installation is ready to
go.
But it relies on several factors, you need a fairly
powerful modern computer to run it at a reasonable speed
and your hardware needs to be detected properly straight
out of the box.
If everthing doesn't setup automatically, you will have
problems, as SUSE is a lot less helpful than Windows if a
device has a problem. Also help available on the internet
seems to be deliberately technical, a holdover from Linux's
origins.
Inexperienced users may also be unsettled by SUSE's
tendency to occasionally display console messages about
an applications workings during normal use.
In conclusion, if I had a new computer and needed an
operating system, I would first test the Suse Live CD, to
see if everything worked alright, if it didn't I would
rather pay the higher price of Windows XP (Or 98se.),
safe in the knowledge that I would have a much more user
friendly experience, with lots of help on hand if I
needed it.
Due to the poor performance of SUSE, I prefer Knoppix, as
it offers virtually the same features, but with less
hassle, it is also much more suited to those of us with
older computers.
I have deleted SUSE from my drive, (It was very easy to
remove.) but it hasn't put me off Linux based systems, I
think I just need to find the flavour that suits me.
Web Site: http://www.novell.com/
Rob Goldfish Web Site
Copyright 2005 Rob Goldfish.
|