Above The Macbeth  70 Hoxton Street  London N1

welcome

programme

archive

projects

contact

the macbeth

Steve Claydon and Neil Chapman

The Sum of the Earth

Private View: Thurs 5 Sept 2002

Fri 6 Sept - Sun 29 Sept

Opening hours: Fri - Sun 2-6

Neil Chapman and Steven Claydons’ undertaking is as systematic as it is
random. As particular as it is general. It proceeds on the assumption that
much scientific endeavour has its origin in accident, indeed, that flaws and
mutations are as essential for evolution as they are for our comprehension
of it. Life is based upon an aberration. There is not an object on Earth
that does not point to this fact, but the most extrovert objects are those
that have been manufactured; Specialised objects, that fit succinctly into
their own systems but seem ludicrous when applied or adapted for use in
others. It is this un-concealment, this disparity, which Chapman and Claydon
have chosen to explore. The fact that even specialised objects are perfectly
adaptable, points more to a flaw in thinking than to a flaw in the things
themselves. All objects are equal and interchangeable according to the
sovereignty of the order that intercepts them.
In light of this ‘The Sum of the Earth’ engages a speculative construction
to allow the manufacture of objects (in this case a broad swathe of things
from silicon masks based on found photographs or a consciously appropriated
concert of cinematic images to the replication of existing objects through
quite alien forms of fabrication) to assume their most flagrant and
lascivious form. As such the works in this exhibition have an almost
sacramental quality. Like the physical germs of an as yet unknown teleology
whose foundations will most certainly be scientific, but only in as much as
they disprove the conventions upon which uniform and rational thinking is
based.
P.A.C.


SCUM OF THE EARTH

'Strange events permit themselves the luxury of occurring.'
Charlie Chan


One cannot propose the chain of development that would lead to intelligence in colonies of scum. But assuming the end result to have been reached, one can at least note some of the conditions that would need to be met. The extreme vulnerability of an ephemeral scum means that intelligent scum must encapsulate themselves in a way affording it mechanical and thermal protection from the environment. We can see that the human brain is a convoluted assembly of cells distributed in layers something like a silk sheet stuffed into a bone bag. We would expect the scum to find a way of rolling itself and its substrate into a ball and acquiring a protective coat. Perhaps this ball would be about as big as a human head but the contents, if evolved from a monolayer of unicellular organisms, would not be an individual as we understand the word, but rather a whole tribe.


Because of the modest abilities of unicellular creatures, cooperation and specialisation would be required on an intimate scale which proximity would facilitate. In the course of time the cells on duty at the mouth of the bag might be the only ones to retain sensitivity to the light. These sentry cells would evolve into eyes if circumstances so dictated. It does not seem implausible that originally unicellular individuals could specialise so as to perform the functions of different tissues and organs. Slime moulds do it all the time. Free swimming myxomycetes come together in numbers and fuse into a single slug.


Steve Claydon and Neil Chapman 2002

 

 

 

back