House of Discipleship

For the Messianic movement to succeed, we need, like the Jewish community as a whole, to lay a strong foundation of communal institutions. A social infrastructure is needed that will provide for our members at every stage of life, from birth to retirement. So it is good to hear discussion and proposals for a ÒHouse of DiscipleshipÓ which will be available for Jewish believers in Jesus needing care and discipleship on a residential basis. Although the project has a long way to go before becoming a reality, the idea is not a new one, and has a distinguished history in the annals of Messianic Judaism in this country.

ÒHouses of DiscipleshipÓ for Jewish believers in Jesus are not new. During the Second World War the Alliance and several Jewish missions were actively involved in providing refugees from Europe with new homes. Properties in Ramsgate, Chislehurst and elsewhere were purchased and used as orphanages, hostels and homes. Those who lived in them were provided with the care they needed, and for some, this involved education and training, as well as spiritual encouragement.

But the origins of the idea go back further than that, right back to medieval times. In 1232 Henry III established a ÒHome for Converted JewsÓ (Domus Conversorum) in what is now Chancery Lane. This was modelled in similar institutions in Oxford and Greenwich, and was open to any Jewish person who had become a Christian.

The necessity for this was obvious. Those who became Christians were often expelled from the Jewish community. They were without protection in a culture that was, to say the least, inhospitable. A further factor was that on ÒconversionÓ all their goods were forfeited to the crown, and they were forced to rely on royal patronage and protection. Henry III was the only European ruler who extended his protection to such people, providing residential accommodation for up to forty people, and living allowances of the not insignificant sum of one penny a day, plus clothing, to those living outside the home.

The home had its own organisation, being governed by a warden, with a chaplain appointed to maintain spiritual life and conduct regular services. According to the records, which may still be accessed from the Public Records Office, there were more than 100 residents from 1232 to 1290. In that year the Jewish community as a whole was expelled from England, only to be re-admitted in 1665. But Jewish ÒconvertsÓ were regarded as exceptions, as were allowed to stay. There are records of up to 80 people per year either living in the home or receiving the KingÕs allowance, and so for several hundred years there is an unbroken historical record of Jewish believers in Jesus.

A frequent accusation against Messianic Jews is that on becoming believers in Jesus we no longer choose to identity as Jews, and choose to assimilate. Yet these residents of the Domus Conversorum were the only visible representatives of the Jewish community in England for four hundred years, and they were never allowed to forget that they were both Jewish and Christian! They continued to sign their names in Hebrew, and indication that they were well-versed in their Jewish backgrounds, and frequently added the sign of the cross afterwards, to show their new faith. It is quite possible that William Shakespeare knew of them and their situation as he wrote his play, Òthe Merchant of Venice.Ó

The home provided protection many from Europe and the Barbary states, and was seen as a beacon of light in a sea of hostility. It also provided Christians with the opportunity to meet with Jewish people, and the interest in Hebrew studies that fuelled the Reformation can be linked to such contacts. The history of co-operation between Jewish scholars and the Reformers is important to note, as in the fields of biblical scholarship, printing and bible translation both Luther and Calvin were indebted to Jewish assistance.

The use of the home diminished after 1609, although several continued to receive pensions for the next 150 years. The office of Warden was combined with the judicial office of Master of the Rolls. In 1891, on the appointment of the first Jewish Master of the Rolls, Lord Jessel, it was felt inappropriate that official responsibility for providing for Jewish Christians should be in the hands of a Jew who did not believe in Jesus, and the home was legally dissolved. ItÕs time we petitioned the Queen for another one!

publications.html