EMU objectives
- Single market
- Price stability
- Exchange rate flexibility
Openness & potential costs of EMU
- devaluation has a much greater effect in a very open country, where
exports are a large proportion of its GDP
- after devaluation the supply curve shifts more in the open country
& thus it has a greater effect than a relatively closed economy
- the result is price instability for the open economy
- so losing the ability to devalue is less important for very open economies
as their prices would suffer a lot of variability
- cost of EMU thus falls with openness of economy
Monetary Integration: costs versus benefits
Costs
- Loss of exchange rate
- Loss of monetary autonomy
- Constraints on fiscal policies
Benefits
- Price transparency
- Increased efficiency – no need to plan for exchange rate fluctuations
– especially for importers who would have to bare hedging costs
- Reduced transaction costs
- No need to have foreign currency reserves for central banks – no separate
currency to protect
- Exchange rate stability – international firms’ pricing, investment,
export markets
- Reduced interest rates
- Increased policy credibility because devaluation is not possible
- less uncertainty from moral hazard, adverse selection due to overly
high or low interest rates
- increased growth especially endogenous growth
- firms: all the benefits reduce costs for firms & thus increase
their competitiveness
- consumers: receive a welfare increase from increase consumer surplus
from the lower prices & reduced uncertainty
Business cycle alignment is really the key issue
- and also whether or not there is enough factor (Capital and Labour)
mobility
|