Developing plateauxed managers
The problem
Firms are becoming more effective and efficient. They are responding to
global competition, relatively slow growth and demanding customers. They are
removing layers of management and creating flatter structures. Flatter
structures reduce communication costs and speed up progress.
Flatter structures reduce the opportunities for managers to progress
vertically through the hierarchy. These "vertical" careers, that most
people hope for, are becoming rarer. Many managers equate vertical career
progression with status and their sense of value at work. If they can't get
this, they may opt out or become negative.
At least three other career patterns are possible. The figure below
summarises them.
|
Career Pattern |
Description |
Benefits to the Individual |
Benefits to the Organisation |
|
Vertical |
Progress through a hierarchy. |
Understood, provides rewards of status and salary. |
Easy to manage when there are opportunities. |
|
Lateral |
Doing different jobs in different parts of the organisation. |
Learning, marketability, good development for general management. |
Breaks down inter departmental barriers. Develops high-fliers. |
|
Detached |
Doing jobs in many different organisations. |
Learning, interest, broadening horizons. |
Breaks down inter company barriers. Encourages an outward-looking
culture. |
|
Inner |
Developing oneself as a person, living ones values. |
Happiness and satisfaction |
Challenges the organisation to think
profoundly |
The last three patterns are possible within flatter structures.
I believe that our common expectation of "vertical" careers is not innate. It had a function to build loyalty to an employer for life. Most managers of around 45 to 60 years have their "vertical" expectation enforced strongly at school, higher education and in their early career. "Work hard at school and then you will get a good job with good prospects!" When they don't get what they expect, they get angry, bitter and may switch off. This is understandable.
Finally, society and many organisations discriminate against older people. It is often unconscious but just as hateful as racism and sexism that most of us condemn. Ageism has an outer component when organisations exclude older people from objective consideration for selection or promotion. It is even more damaging when we start to believe the nonsense that society says about us. "I am no good because I am 45. I just have to keep my nose clean and then I can retire."
The internalised ageism can make older employees avoid risks and growth opportunities. It does not have to be this way. We all know of 80 year olds who live exciting lives and make good things happen. It is rare but it is possible.
If organisations don't deal with this issue they will become stuck. Hopelessness is contagious as fed up people discourage others especially when they manage people.
What is the alternative?
One alternative is to create a more liberating organisation. The
organisation would foster the growth and development of all its people. This
does not mean going back to the old multi‑layered organisation.
The organisation would liberate the talents and energy of its older
employees by: -
Valuing their special qualities such as sense of proportion, experience and practical skills.
Asking them what they can contribute and what would help them contribute more.
Actively seeking their unused talents.
Outlawing direct and indirect age based discrimination.
Teaching their bosses to develop people by listening, appreciation, support and challenge.
Setting up coconsulting and support groups so older people can help each other.
Setting up cross functional projects and involving older people in them.
Tapping their wisdom of older employees by having them "mentor" more junior staff.
Encouraging "master/apprentice" relationships. These benefit both parties.
Find ways to reward people for working better as well as hierarchical responsibilities.
Everyone is rigid to some extent and finds some things difficult to learn. If an older person finds say learning to use some software difficult, then the junior person could help. Mutual development can be very creative for both.
What are the potential benefits
of solving this problem?
There would be energy and excitement because everyone is involved in learning. This atmosphere and the freer communication would lead to you developing new products, services and ideas more quickly. The organisation would be more flexible and balanced. Your best people would stay. You might even find new products to sell as you think more about the needs and feelings of 45 - 60 year olds.
How to progress this?
This is not a finished piece of work. I think the following might be the
possible next steps.
Discuss further with me and your colleagues in the HR function.
Discuss with Directors and decide who is the "Champion" of this project.
Collect data from a sample of the organisation to further understand of the issues.
Feedback the results to a planning group of "young and old" and "HR and line" people
Set up some small experiments
Monitor results and plans and extend.
Using these materials
I am entirely happy for you to use or draw on any these materials in any way you think will be helpful. I am keen to have my work, and the work of the people I have learned from, used.
Please will you say where you found them? One way might be to give a link back to www.nickheap.co.uk or to info@nickheap.co.uk. This will help these positive ideas to spread, and help my business, too.
Thank you
Nick Heap