|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Life and Work of Alexander Thomson |
|
|
|
| Reproduced
with kind permission - McFadzean R, The Life and Work of Alexander
Thomson, London (1979), pp24-30 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PART
ONE THE EARLY YEARS BAIRD & THOMSON, WORK 1949-56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contemporary with Seymour Lodge is Craig Ailey. It is situated
near the village of Kilcreggan but instead of being on the level
raised beach like Seymour Lodge, it is located on a prominence
about eighty feet above sea level and commanding spectacular
views over the Firth of Clyde to the south and west. It is in
a style which is chiefly derived from Italian Romanesque forms
- often referred to in the nineteenth century as Italianate.
It was originally designed as a summer residence for John
McElroy, a contractor in Glasgow. Space was used as economically
as possible in its internal arrangements and many of the features
noted in Seymour Lodge reappear in this building but Thomson
has developed them with much greater power and imagination.
The relation of the building to the landscape assumes far
greater importance than at Seymour Lodge and it is clear that,
in this composition, one of Thomson's primary aims was an
unusually close integration of the building with nature. The
villa was constructed on a high podium of rough stones set
on end to suggest a continuation of the stratified cliff,
near the brink of which the building is placed. This extraordinary
treatment firmly ties the building into the landscape by its
sheer mass and gives the impression that the house is growing
out of the cliff, instead of merely being an object placed
upon it. This is very much a mediaeval conception reminiscent
of the castles of the Middle Ages standing on their rocky
eminence's, but it must be remembered that these structures
grew out of defense considerations and not from aesthetic
ideals. It is curious that Thomson did not adopt the Greek
practice of
|
 |
|
|
| 10
Craig Ailey, Kilcreggan, Dunbartonshire (1850): view from the
south east showing the picturesque nature of the composition. |
|
|
| setting a building
in the landscape like a huge piece of sculpture with the surrounding
landscape as a background. This illustrates the independence
and flexibility of Thomson's mind and shows that, in spite of
his developing belief in the principles of classical architecture,
he had the courage to depart from doctrinaire ideals and adapt
ideas from other styles when he believed that they could still
contribute to the advancement of architecture.
Apart from the outstanding example of Ellisland (1871) all
of his villas are asymmetrical in composition. Craig Ailey
relies for its very picturesque effect on the use of simple
stone masses which build up to a small tower crowned by a
shallow pyramidal roof with a very broad eaves overhanging
the wallhead. The general impression is one of great stability
and strength gained by the balancing of one form against another
and by the sensitive contrast of small round headed windows
with plain stone walls.
A weakness of design is that it is obvious that Thomson intended
it to be viewed mainly from the south-east. From this aspect
the principal and secondary forms are strongly grouped to
afford maximum effect to the composition. Although the villa
is of interest from other view points, none of them approaches
the south-east aspect in imaginative skill and mastery of
design. His reason for this attitude to composition is unknown
but he could, perhaps, have been influenced by the picturesque
qualities of buildings depicted in landscape paintings. It
is known that he had a great interest in the fine arts and
a deep admiration for the work of John Martin and J.M.W. Turner
in particular.
|
 |
|
|
| 11
Craig Ailey: Plans from Villa and Cottage Architecture. In his
efforts to maintain external symmetry Thomson used the unattractive
device of off-set window reveals at the dressing room and bath
room on the upper floor. |
|
|
| The horizontal
emphasis noticed in the kitchen wing at Seymour Lodge is developed
in a much more emphatic manner at Craig Ailey and is not restricted
to one part of the building only but is carried across, and
around, all the elevations thus acting as a powerful three-dimensional
unifying element. The use of the rugged schistose podium capped
by a contrasting dressed freestone plinth, dressed string and
corbel courses which are continuous around the whole building,
together with the low pitched roofs and there broad overhanging
eaves and extended projections at the gables, contribute to
the restful horizontal quality of the villa.
The overhanging roofs are quite different
in construction and in their aesthetic qualities from those
at Seymour Lodge. The most obvious difference is the pitch
of the roofs. At Seymour Lodge the main roof pitch varies
from 45º to 61º while the lower secondary roofs
range from through 40º, 44º and 67º. This lack
of uniformity in pitch may have been a deliberate attempt
to exaggerate the picturesque nature of the building and thus
emphasise its relaxed, casual quality but it also tends to
convey an impression of disorganisation.
In complete contrast to Seymour Lodge
the main roofs at Craig Ailey have a uniform pitch of 30º
with a variety of even lower pitches over the secondary roofs
- 25º over the tower, 17º at the bay window, and
16º over the main entrance. The consistency of pitch
over the main roofs gives a sense of coherence to the main
building while the
|
|
|
|
|
| 12
Craig Ailey: South Elevation from Villa and Cottage Architecture.The
podium of masonry laid on edge is most unusual and is
intended to echo the appearance of the nearby cliffs |
|
| very shallow
roofs over the lower secondary elements help to bring
the main mass of the building into harmony with the sloping
nature of the surrounding garden.
By adopting such low roof pitches, Thomson
could be regarded as taking an unacceptable risk which
could only result in failure to keep out the effect
of adverse weather. To avoid this hazard he used large
Westmorland slates, double nailed, and covered the very
shallow bay window with lead sheeting. The relative
flatness of his roofs has often been used as an argument
against his constructional skill but the following comment
written in 1868 about Craig Ailey seems to contradict
the objection:
Objections are often urged against roofs
of so low a pitch as those of this villa, but the experience
gained by this house, standing as it does in a very
exposed position, goes far to prove that such roofs
really require less repair than those of a steep gothic
pitch. Whilst roofs of the latter form on houses similarly
situated in the immediate vicinity of the one under
consideration have been often damaged by the severe
gales to which this coast is exposed, those of this
villa have now stood for a number of years without requiring
any considerable repair. The great projection of the
roof is found of material advantage in protecting the
walls and preserving them water-tight.
Visually, the roof surfaces at Craig
Ailey are very simple, relying for effect on the inherent
qualities of the slates while those at Seymour Lodge
display an interesting use of undersized West Highland
slates which are arranged as horizontal bands contrasted
with others cut to a diamond pattern. This gives variety
and lightness to the roof. The drawings show that this
treatment is in character with the ornate quality of
the house but in reality it is hardly noticeable. To
twentieth-century eyes the device may appear meretricious
but to the Victorian middle class it was perhaps necessary
to express their new wealth by such decorative display.
Craig Ailey abounds with unusual masonry
detail composed of a strange mixture of Italian Romanesque,
Gothic and classical forms which are combined with great
skill. It is only upon close examination that one realises
the very wide range of styles from which Thomson was
drawing inspiration at this stage in his career.
So far, consideration has been
given to the use of similar architectural features and
ideas in Seymour Lodge and Craig Ailey, but it is now
time to examine two themes which occur in the latter
house and which acquire great importance in his latter
villas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 Craig
Ailey: the bay window of the drawing room showing the
curious mixture of Romanesque and classically inspired
details. From Villa and Cottage Architecture. |
|
| The
first is the tower, which has already been mentioned.
It does not contain a stair. As many imagine, but a belvedere,
or smoking room, and provides a very important vertical
element when contrasted with the horizontal emphasis of
the rest of the villa. It must not be thought that this
is an original idea. Its origins are obscure but it was
already present in Britain in the early nineteenth century
when it was used in a circular form at Cronkhill (1802)
by John Nash and by Paxton at Edensor (1838-42). In addition,
it occurs frequently in the smaller villas of Italy; abounds
as a background incident in many eighteenth - and nineteenth-century
paintings; and was used by Karl Friedrich von Schinkel,
Klaus von Arnim, Ludwig Persius and other German neo-classical
architects in the early half of the nineteenth century
throughout Britain and in the USA.
The second feature of interest to emerge
at Craig Ailey is the use of decorative motifs derived
directly from the classical. In masonry this is confined
to the flanking pilasters at the main entrance where
very simple mouldings are used to build up a kind of
pseudo-Tuscan Order. In lesser hands, one would expect
to find an entablature and pediment over this feature
but Thomson's classicism is far from rigid, and so he
substitutes a shallow hip roof with wide eaves for the
pediment.
The ornamental cast-iron riling over
the bay window is freely derived from the anthemion
and honeysuckle motifs which are such common decorative
features in Greek architecture while the finial crowning
the tower is obviously inspired by the Choragic Monument
of Lysicrates.
The chimney pots, which are of terracotta,
are about six feet high and have been handled in striking
fashion as short columns, each with a base, a shaft
and a capital which is a curious blend of Greek and
perhaps Egyptian ideas. They are arranged in groups
of three which helps to emphasise their columnar qualities.
The use of Greek-inspired decoration and detailing gradually
assumes greater importance in Thomson's buildings until
about 1855-6 when the first of his really classically
inspired buildings appears.
Possessing a different quality are the
gateposts adjacent to the main entrance from the tree
lined road. They are constructed of irregular blocks
of white quartz collected from the nearby shore with
all decorative features carried out in freestone. They
resemble miniature towers with corbels and shallow pitched
coping stones reminiscent of the main tower of the villa.
The use of materials and the bizarre handling of forms
and proportions are highly suggestive of the work of
Antonio Gaudi (1852-1926) and represent one of Thomson's
most astonishingly prophetic designs.
Elsewhere in Britain at this time,
villas were designed in the cottage orné or the
Italian Romanesque styles and consequently Seymour Lodge
and Craig Ailey are variants of these. What is significant
in Thomson's work is that despite some lack of originality
he has handled them both convincingly and is already
moving towards the underlying principles of his mature
work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|