![]() |
|
Appreciation
and Progression of the Ideal Budgerigar By Eric Peake Since the early 1930’s when serious exhibiting of budgerigars began, the ideal budgerigar has changed many times. Prior to 1980 many exhibition budgerigars were either caught on camera or viewed by the exhibitor. The late R.A.Vowles, a top bird artist in the 1970’s could see the birds of the future. Many of his excellent black and white drawings graced the pages of ‘Cage Birds’. With ‘Cage Birds’ published weekly, it allowed Vowles to depict many views of the exhibition budgerigar. Through Vowles’ eyes fanciers could see the progression being made in the exhibition budgerigar. As far as the show bench budgerigar was concerned, one man progressed the fancy more than any other. This, of course, was the late Harry Bryan. Like Vowles, he could see beyond the exhibition budgerigar of the day. His numerous successes on the show bench made him the mentor for many a fancier. The Budgerigar Society, to give guidance to their exhibitors, issued a pictorial ideal, which was used until the late 1970’s. During the late 1970’s birds with superior head quality were quickly taking over the pictorial ideal. Consequently, a request was made to update the standard. In 1980-81 I had the pleasure to paint a new standard for the exhibition budgerigar, which is still used to today. By illustrating a side and ¾ view the exhibitor was given a more accurate standard to measure by. A simple exercise to compare one’s birds to the ideal can be carried out by any fancier. Simply cut out in the ideal image as printed in the ‘Budgerigar Society Handbook’. Place this cut out in the show cage and then compare the ideal with the bird in question. One can then clearly see the 8 ½” ideal bird is a large bird and in good proportion. The
Head Most
winning birds should display good head qualities. The skull
structure is one of the most difficult areas to breed in the exhibition
budgerigar. If we look at the width of face on the bird, it has to
be in proportion to the height above the cere. Achieving a full back
skull is the most challenging task. Too many birds show a lack of
back skull, which is an undesirable feature on the exhibition bird.
The bird must have a deep mask in which to carry the large spots. A
shallow mask is a major fault and must be avoided at all costs. Wings
The
wings need to sit neatly on the base of the tail. Crossed wings or
dropped wings are considered a serious fault. Both are hereditary and
birds possessing these faults should be eliminated from exhibition
breeding stock. The
normal wing markings have been a main feature of the exhibition
budgerigar; a normal light green split for Opaline can sometimes show
green on the shell markings, which should be yellow. Opalescent
marks can also appear on the shoulders and wing butts of a normal bird. In
the Opaline we have always tried to achieve a clear saddle. Along
with a clear head. In recent years, dirty back Opalines have
appeared and numerous forms of flecking on the head. This is the
over emphasis of melanin coming from the normal bird, especially in the
dark factor variety. Tail
There are 2 main faults in the tail. A dropping or almost vertical tail is considered a serious fault. The correct angle of the tail should be 60 degrees through the eye. A tail too long, the other fault, is usually associated with long flighted birds where the distance from the vent top the tip of the tail usually exceeds the body length. Style and Stance
To achieve success on the show bench a winning bird must have style and stance. Style is usually inherited. Stance, on the other hand, is usually achieved by training the bird from an early age. In
conclusion, the ideal exhibition budgerigar could possible be altered in
pictorial form by illustrating a larger head and more feather detail.
This would have to be done in a somewhat loose manner as the previous
pictorial ideals have always been sharpe and concise with a clean outline.
Considering there are only a few hundred of the million and a half
exhibition budgerigars breed each year meeting the standard; perhaps it
would be inappropriate to change the ideal at his time. Since this article was written, Eric was asked and is currently painting the New BS ideal, this is due to be issued by the Budgerigar Society in June 2000.
|
![]() |
|
| All
information on this site: Copyright © 2000 - Keith Jones Web Design Page last updated, 22 August, 2000 |
|