I am very much looking forward to a week on Tuesday, when the first episode of the adaptation of my teenage lesbian novel Sugar Rush goes out on Channel 4 just after Big Brother. Its been an eventful ride before Id so much as put pen to paper, two newspapers had run pieces saying how much sexual havoc my book would cause among the nations underage female youth (one of them The Times, heh heh; they won t be doing THAT this time round, do we think?) Then once Id finished it and was doing the publicity round, a bunch of swots got upset that it had taken me only a handful of afternoons after A Good Lunch to write. As if there was any credit in having to try hard at something! surely it just means youre thick?
Many things about this adaptation delight me; the brilliance of the acting, the beauty of the Brighton backdrop, the sheer molten enjoyment of the prospect of outraging the Daily Hell yet again. But more than anything after too many years of being shown as a full-on vale of tears it is the sheer fun and games aspect of lesbianism portrayed in Sugar Rush that cheers and revives. Admittedly Kim, the lovelorn heroine, has a blub or two in the toilets while the object of her affection drunkenly snogs a long line of dumb and dumber boys but that can be put down to adolescent hormones and teenage angst far more than any same-sex preference. All in all, though, the tears of sorrow shed in Sugar Rush are vastly outnumbered by the tears of helpless mirth and how many heterosexual relationships can you say that of? And, though I love them dearly, a sizeable minority of gay men do tend towards shag-the-pain-away hysteria, often with disastrous results. But, if they can avoid Bed Death on the third date, lesbianism is as near to the horizontal Good Life as we know it.
You wouldnt think it, though, to go by the representations of dykery in books and films. Take a walk on the Sapphic side of the street in art as opposed to reality and, from The Well of Loneliness to Mulholland Drive, its a right old soba-thon; that old German flick title The Bitter Tears of Petra Von Kant really spells it out. And even when theyre getting a kick out of life its because theyre sick, twisted, psychopathic killers, like in Basic Instinct or Monster! Where does this idea come from, I wonder? I know only one lesbian couple, but Ive got to say theyre the happiest couple I know. Unlike my straight friends, they never row or bicker and their life often appears to be one long romp, full of dogs and fields and Jeeps. Going round their house something I normally never do, as I find coupledom a kind of living death is like going to Center Parcs, and when Im there I literally never want to leave.
It seems like a real home full of laughs in the way that very few straight homes do. And this must be because, although they are grown-ups in that they go out into the world and earn large amounts of money, my friends have retained a youthful attitude to life which can only have been assisted by their Sapphic state; no kids, no nannies, no school fees, no stultifying the-animals-went-in-two-by-two dinner-parties.
All that disposable income and free time cant help but give a happy couple a head start when it comes to fun and, of course, the unshakeable advantage of doing something that society doesnt really approve of, which has a way of keeping people young like nothing else. Plus lesbianism has all the sorts of health advantages that youd think would have the Daily Hell jumping up and cheering; the lowest rate of all sexual diseases of any sexual demographic, most notably Aids. Somebody up there likes them.
Lesbians are often written off by gay men as party poopers but in my experience theres nothing to prove that you cant have the dizziest and silliest of times while wearing sensible shoes. So the Candy Bar, Brightons only bona fide designer dyke watering hole, may be about to close down but thats because lesbians are looning around at home with their mates and making their own entertainment. The irony is that youll find more straight girls snogging in bars than you will gay ones especially when there are rich and famous men about.
Talking of which, in recent weeks lots of well-meaning female columnists have been having the vapours over the current state of mens magazines, and the fact that shock, horror men like to look at photographs of pretty women with their clothes off. Im as much of a feminist as anyone and unlike these liberal pussies, I believe in castration for proven rapists, so actually Im far more of one! but for the life of me I cant see what theyre fussing about. Especially healthy, I cant help feeling, is the sight of fit girls cuddling each other. Titillation, schmitillation so long as theyre getting their kit off and doing a bit of girl-on-girl body-surfing, who cares!
So while teenage lesbians are definitely my most desired Sugar Rush audience, dirty old men are welcome, too. Because lesbianism is a fine and lovely thing; even when it starts as nothing more than a fashionable look, it has the power to bring down worthless and/or played-out heterosexual unions, which can only be a relief all round. And even when one doesnt stick to it, it can work wonders in showing us exactly what we want from men, and what crap we arent prepared to put up with; the perfect sexual palate cleanser. Thus the more people who appreciate it even rhythmically, by proxy, wearing the Empresss New Clothes or wearing none on the cover of a lad mag the better. The more the merrier and the gayer, the greater.
Sugar Rush, Channel 4, June 7, 10.50pm
julie.burchill@thetimes.co.uk