Opinion - Julie Burchill


May 07, 2005

Adultery, a user’s guide

Julie Burchill

Spring, and a rich and famous young man’s fancy turns to exactly where he put that pre-nup. And with the current state of what were until recently thought to be the two most solid showbiz marriages in Christendom — those of the Beckhams and the Pitts — what hope can there possibly be for the rest of the posing, preening flibbertigibbets, be they crooners, thesps or kickers of balls? Look at Wayne and Coleen — not even married, and already the bets are on that they’ll have broken up by the next Bank Holiday; not even out of their teens and they’ve already built up an impressive back catalogue of he-said she-said grudge matches. Infidelity, use of prostitutes, fisticuffs — he wouldn’t be out of place in the gin-and-Jag stockbroker belt. The fight between the couple’s families at their engagement party; her crazed shopping sprees, which seem designed solely to show up her lack of ability to choose or wear clothes; they seem, despite Rooney’s alleged great gift, to have been plucked by some cruel deity’s hand on a whim — like in Clash of the Titans — just to illustrate what fools these mortals be. Next thing you know, Coleen’s going to turn up on the front-page of the red-tops, tied to some rocks as a virgin sacrifice to the terrible Kraken. But the day will be saved when Wayne turns up and offers it his autograph (as he did with those prossies that time, the bright spark) and it flies off happy as Larry.

Though one is loath to burden this young couple with the usual Daily Hell preach-pieces about How They Are The Worst Thing In The World, Ever, Including Hitler, they do seem to exist in a realm beyond mere sport/shopping now; they seem to exist solely to illustrate a morality tale in the manner of medieval mummers — Too Much, Too Young. There are so many of these couples these days; Jordan and Peter: Don’t Judge A Book By Its Cover. Kate and Pete: Love Laughs at Locksmiths. David and Victoria: Handsome is As Handsome Does. Brad and Jen: Don’t Let Your Husband Make A Film With Angelina Jolie, Ever! In themselves, celebrity couples are far less interesting than they used to be, probably because there are now so many of them, and they all seem to meet, date and eventually hate in the same way and with increasingly dizzying speed. Of course, serial marriage and divorce has always been a mainstay of showbiz, as normal as blood-sucking agents, plastic surgery and tiny dogs pampered to within an inch of their lives; for the first time, with the raising of the Hollywood sign, there was a place which acted as a magnet for millions of the most physically attractive people in the world. And Mexico, where a marriage could be ended just by waving a fistful of dollars, was just across the border. Hollywood razed monogamy, made it a museum piece, with the allowance of a level of promiscuity that would have got an alley cat stoned to death outside the city walls.

But the old-style pairings and sunderings seemed to have much more, well, style, much as I hate to use that word. And by style I don’t necessarily mean Bryan Ferry in his peachy prime, standing by a swimming pool in a white suit, cradling a martini, though I’m not averse to a bit of that either. No, for behaviour to be stylish, especially if questionable morally, it must be clear-eyed and somewhat shameless. It isn’t about ceaseless sneaking around, lying and denying and, above all, it’s not about being a hypocrite.

Think what the magnificent Elizabeth Taylor — supposedly a mindless product of the stultifying studio system — said to an interviewer when asked about her numerous marriages: “What do you expect me to do, sleep alone?” Then contrast it with what Angelina Jolie said when asked about her rumoured relationship with a Hollywood hunk: “I don’t sleep with my co-stars.” Of those two, who sounds like the free spirit? Think of the old days — princesses such as Margaret and Grace losing love for their country and marrying for kingdoms, bolters and headless men being dragged through the divorce courts. Marilyn Monroe marrying Joe DiMaggio, then Arthur Miller; the Body, the Brain and the goddess who had both of them. Jayne Mansfield in a skintight pink jumpsuit, nipples pointing all the way to Neptune, breathing, “I’m the marrying kind” as she prepared to do the deed yet again.

Just type the words “marriage” and “quotes” into a search engine, and everyone from Oscar Wilde to Zsa Zsa Gabor was capable of coming up with dozens of brilliant, bitter, glinting quips on the subject. These days, perhaps because so much is allowed, so little that is truly striking and original seems to happen in the game of love. Couple meet on-set or in players’ lounge; date, mate and spawn; have tattoo of other’s name; get sick of each other — and then the lies start, not so much to each other as to the public who were previously sold every soppy, sickening detail of their private lives. We will be told that there is “no third party involved” — especially not their sexy current co-star in some film that turns out to be Grade A pigswill anyway; that the suspect co-respondent is also a “dear friend” of the dupe as well as the adulterer; that all three have the “utmost respect” for each other — and then, after a solid six months or more of this arrant offal, come the first photos of the adulterers on the beach. Then the lawyers arrive, the tattoos come off and so do the gloves, and all merry hell breaks loose. And you just wonder why they bothered denying it for so long.

Adultery makes a hero of no one — I’d been banged to rights for it twice by my mid-thirties, so I should know — but the one way to bring any level of honesty or honour to it is to hold your head up, be proud of your new feelings for your new squeeze and get the hell out ASAP. It’s the hanging around trying to have your cake and screw it while telling 12 shades of porkies to the papers that makes people look like clowns — especially if they’ re always banging on about “integrity”, as so many of them do. At the risk of sounding a prig, consistent lying and denying on the level and at the length that these jokers go in for it brings a real deepening of cynicism to public life — just as politicians are accused of. The media are often accused of deceit and manipulation, but perhaps we were made that way by the eye-popping degree of protracted fibs that the new breed of celebs goes in for. Compared with them, we look like Gandhi.

julie.burchill@thetimes.co.uk