Having become involved in discussions about carbon
dioxide, I decided it was about time to take a bit of a look at the data.
Previously, I had only given it a cursory glance rather than really studying it.
I downloaded some data with the following header reference:
J.M. Barnola, Raynaud, & C. Lorius
Laboratoire de Glaciologie et de Geophysique de
l'Environnement
38402 Saint Martin d'Heres Cedex, France
N. I. Barkov
Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute
Beringa Street 38
St. Petersburg 199226, Russia
January 2003
The file has four data columns:
Depth (m)
Ice Age (Years BP)
Air Age (Years(BP)
CO2 Concentration (ppmv)
First things first, I plotted the data. Everything was much as
expected. I was intrigued that there was such a difference between the ice and
gas ages, so I decided to plot the difference on the same graph as the four
basic measurements:
What I found striking was the apparent correlation between the
age difference and the concentration of carbon dioxide. It had to be
investigated, so I cross-plotted the two parameters, achieving the
following:
As can be seen, the correlation is significant (Corr. Coeff. =
0.8998). But it is also very interesting to note the y-intercept of the
fitted equation. It is equal to 328.25 ppmv. If this trend is continued back to
zero age difference, then the measured CO2 concentration would be expected to be
about 328 ppmv. Zero age difference implies a measurement made soon after snow
has fallen and captured the air.
Rather than repeat this information in two forms, I have decided
to write a paper. It is linked to here as a pdf file.