The September events in the US highlighted the friendship
between the US and the UK. Bush thanked Tony Blair on
international television and there were stories of New
Yorkers shaking hands with strangers with British accents.
Playing the US National Anthem in London was an affecting
and well-judged gesture, in a culture where radical changes
are not usually acceptable. The circumstances were exceptional,
and so was the sympathetic response. We were shocked,
appalled and upset, like the rest of the world. But there
is something about the UK-US relationship that is distinctive,
beyond the political rhetoric. The US came to our aid
in the Second World War and it is quite likely Hitler
would have won, had they not done so. There are historical
reasons for our common understanding, like two friends
who have learned to trust each other over a period of
time. Yet it is not only based on history.
US mythology is based on freedom, initiative and opportunity,
leaving the past behind. It is forward-looking and essentially
egalitarian. The UK is steeped in heritage and traditions.
It gives us a national identity that we sometimes forget,
partly because it has been eroded by recent societal changes.
Yet we can still invoke Churchill and the spirit of the
Blitz, when necessary. It is hard to believe, looking
at dissolute British life in its various forms - but I
think it is true. A sense of justice and fair play underlies
the British psyche. The atrocities contradicted that so
offensively, that we have to protest. It's just not cricket
- and you don't want to mess with this kind of English
outrage.
I look towards the US admiringly, as a place where enterprise
and success are supported. The US psyche looks forwards;
unconsciously, the British psyche looks backward. I find
television programmes like Antiques Road Show quite
boring. Yet the US enjoy that kind of thing a little enviously;
a US chat buddy told me recently that she really liked
it. Her idea was that this country is full of interesting,
old buildings. Well it is - Bill Bryson wrote that there
was more heritage in his local vicinity than the entire
US. Old is not always attractive, but I can understand
the appeal here. The US has no old buildings like Westminster,
or even Manchester. This does, I suppose, endow the British
psyche with an identity. Yet how beautiful those two towers
in New York were: shining glass and steel constructions,
testifying to the power of aspiration and enterprise.
It seems to me this is central to the Trans-Atlantic
understanding. We have a strong Anglo-Saxon heritage that
the US both envies and respects. Here in the UK, we understand
how suffocating and narrow-minded British tradition is
- or at least, I do. Vapid, superficial and materialistic
as US culture can be, its wealth and vibrancy looks refreshing
compared to tired old Britain.