|

|
|
IS THE SMALL FRY A BIG
FISH? by Anne O. Nymous |
|
This article is based on
a 2004 demonstration given
by Colin Fry in Sweden.
The author wishes
to remain anonymous to
enable further investigations to be carried out unhindered.
|
|
It's hard to be objective when you like somebody, and I must confess I
like Colin Fry. Being used to psychics looking like thugs, Fry is a fresh
addition to the Swedish paranormal scene. And judging by his upcoming tour
schedule, the new website, www.colinscollege.com, it is apparent that Fry
is in the process of increasing his share of the Swedish market of
fantasy-prones. Although you might not consider it a loss in the UK, it is
definitely a gain here in Sweden. Take my word for it, should you meet one
of our domestic psychics, including Terry Evans, late one night, you
would, without a doubt, choose to walk on the other side of the street.
Colin Fry is charming, eloquent, probably intelligent and very
entertaining. He also dresses sharply, although his accentuation of some
of his preferences may be disturbing to the older segments of the Swedish
woo-woo audience. Personally, I think it adds a bit of glamour to a
community that tends to be a bit too grey and too dull on the client side
and a veritable bad-taste party on the supply side -- Fry's approach is a
breath of fresh air in comparison. In fact, I could easily imagine him
working in mid-level management or at some sales and marketing division in
one of our global corporations. And although his preferences are not to my
taste, meeting him late at night would include drinks and laughter instead
of running for my life, as would be the case with the rest of the psychic
lot in Sweden.
But Fry does not have a corporate career, he claims that he talks to dead
people and makes the most out of it; it is evident that Fry is in it for
the money and that he knows how to turn his claims into good business -
the new www.colinscollege.com website has a distinctly commercial touch
and features online course bookings and payment via PayPal. The "school"
that has formed around another British psychic in Sweden, Mrs. Iris Hall,
will have to face cut-throat competition from this hard-core spiritualist
operating from the spiritual "college" of Ramsbergsgarden. He's charming,
professional and has a background that can be checked and verified -
qualities other Swedish psychics would kill for. And a union with the Hall
school, formal or informal, is very unlikely - I very much doubt that Fry
would mingle with the Hall school riff-raff.
As for the core of Fry's business, I would like to start with a bit of
sincere advice to Fry - in case he reads this - before I commence with the
experience of a live Fry séance. Mr. Fry, if you are going to hold a
séance, or any form of public demonstration, in Sweden, it is a must to
have an interpreter who is able to put forward what you say to the
audience. Thus, an interpreter should have a solid understanding of, and
respect for, your language, English, and a solid knowledge of, and respect
for, the language of your audience, in this case Swedish. It is especially
important for a man like yourself, who, I imagine, takes great pride in
being able to communicate with people of all types and of all ages.
Unfortunately, Ms. or Mrs. Jane Lyzell's interpretation of you is
degrading your efforts and is an insult to the audience. I don't care how
valuable she is to your organization - on stage, she is a disaster. And I
do not wish to be rude, I just want to state a fact.
Lyzell made so many errors, minor and major, during 90 minutes, that if
the fact that the audience on several occasions had to correct her doesn't
tell you something, her distortion of your words should. She made "arms
crossed" come out as "arms crushed", "gold bars" come out as "gold logs",
"pencil" come out as "paintbrush", etc., etc. She converted an aunt to a
sister - I have kept this passage in the transcript. She also has the bad
habit of trying to explain what you are saying, and in doing so,
distorting the meaning of your words. That is not interpreting, that is to
mess things up. If you want people to pay for your words, at least let
them have your words. You started off the séance by telling me, and the
rest of the audience: "For God's sake, smile!" I don't think you requested
a spiteful smile, so my answer is: For God's sake, give her the boot!
Now, for those of you who are accustomed to the Sixth Sense series, a live
séance with Colin Fry might be a bit disappointing. There are no amazing
revelations, no on-the-spot messages or any statements indicating that Fry
actually communicates with dead people. It's just the old standard cold
reading techniques and perhaps even some hot reading, but above all, a hit
and miss ratio that is far from what is being broadcast in the UK. If Fry
is to get some credit, it is for his creativity in stock spiel and the
confidence with which he handles the audience. And one must remember that
Sixth Sense is a carefully orchestrated show with an audience that must
book tickets, with names, and - according to some sources - also give an
account of why they want to be on the Sixth Sense show. What is finally
broadcast is, of course, edited in order to secure a "Wow!" reaction from
the viewers. Nothing, absolutely nothing, can be said about Fry's "psychic
powers" based on the TV show.
A live séance is a horse of a different colour. Well, you were recommended
to book tickets in advance but I did as always, I just showed up. No
problem, since it's about money and they want to fill up the hall. At
first, I was happy to note that Colin Fry didn't mingle around in the
ante-room before the show. But moments later, I noticed a chap sitting on
a chair in a corner, alone, without outdoor clothes (everybody else
brought theirs into the auditorium), watching everybody and typing stuff
on his cell phone. He didn't speak to anybody, he was obviously not part
of the coffee stand crew and he was a bit too interested in the people in
the room to be typing at the same time. But, as I saw no signs of hot
reading later during the show - except when he asked a lady if she had
fallen on her right hip (the guy in the ante-room could easily have
spotted a limp or her cane), I have decided to give Mr. Fry the benefit of
the doubt on this one. If you're thinking of attending a live Fry séance,
I suggest you keep your eyes open for this chap, just in case...
Once in my seat, I notice that one of Sweden's most renowned mediums, Mr.
Jorgen "Cry Baby" Gustafsson, is in the audience, just a couple of rows in
front of me. Since Gustafsson is a disciple of Mrs. Hall, I suppose that
she decided to send one of her henchmen to check out the competition. The
woman next to him will play a part in the séance later, but for now, the
couple sitting in front of her and Gustafsson is more interesting, because
before the show, Fry himself suddenly appears and advances to their seats
in the middle of the hall. Apparently, they are good friends and I note
that their conversation is carefree and hearty. Will Fry be cheeky enough
to make use of his friends during the séance?
|
Full transcript of
clairvoyant evening with Colin Fry on which this article is based »
My checklist
1. The medium gives accurate, detailed and
personal information, pertaining only to the addressed individual.
2. The medium does not engage in stock spiels, i.e. general statements
that will apply to almost everyone, or any other cold reading technique
as described by sceptics.
3. The medium gives information that he or she couldn't have known
beforehand by any means.
4. The medium does not seek the participation of the audience in order
to convey any messages.
So does Colin Fry meet the demands imposed
by "believers"?
Let's see.
|
|
After the
obligatory introduction, Fry starts off by telling the audience to smile,
not to keep their arms crossed and to think of somebody else, thus
eliminating selfishness which has a negative effect on "the energies" or
something like it. Then he asks us to make sure that our cell phones are
switched off, so he doesn't get interfering messages from babysitters.
Fry's execution of this warm-up is excellent and it immediately sets the
audience in a comfortable mood. Did I forget something? Oh, remember the
checklist I have in my mind when I attend mediumistic demonstrations? You
can read it in the column to the left of this article.
I have based these criteria on the assurances always supplied by
"believers" when discussing personal experiences of psychic mediums. These
are the points always put forward to let me know how to recognize a
"genuine psychic". And what I forgot to mention about Fry is that in the
end of his requirement list, he added:
"Now, it's very, very important, that when we do make a connection, you
must talk to me. I always say that as a medium I'm like a telephone
switchboard for the spirit world. I ring out for them. And if nobody
responds or replies, they disconnect or they're disconnected. OK?"
So, I guess that takes care of number four. Fry explicitly asks the
audience for their participation in order to be able to convey messages.
Whatever Fry says, he needs the audience to tell him whether it has any
significance or not. It also means that Fry is able to adapt to whatever
the audience tells him. This is essential in cold reading and it does not
match what the "believers" claim is the sign of a genuine psychic.
Fry's first contact is with a woman that never lived in Sweden, something
he finds "very strange". Now, since the 60s, Sweden has been flooded by
immigrants from different parts of the world, seeking work or refuge. My
grandfather or my grandmother never lived in Sweden, nor did my husband's
- we are both regarded as second generation immigrants. In an audience of
120-130 people, it would be very strange if Fry didn't find at least ten
or more people who would "recognize" such a woman. So his bewilderment
with this is obviously an act. His additional aspects of this woman - he
sees "bright colours", doesn't narrow the selection much but he is
observant enough to note that a woman in a purple scarf is whispering to
her companion. But Fry's statement is far from enough for the woman, and
she needs more information. Fry tries to deliver:
"What I'm going to ask you to do is, it's very important, that you don't
tell me anymore than I need to know. Let me tell you what it is that, you
know, that I'm feeling, alright? I get the feeling from this lady that in,
uhm... her life, that she had either damaged her hands in some way or
that, uhm... later in life her hands were very deformed. Does this make
sense to you?"
Now, this is beginning to be more specific information and he also manages
to put forward the standard phrase used by all mediums; they ask you to
not tell them more than they need to know. Think about that for a moment.
Why does Fry or any medium need to know anything to convey messages from
alleged spirits? Would they need to know anything if they really were
actually communicating with dead people?
OK, back to the séance. Fry is beginning to close in on the purple scarf
woman - does the spirit having deformed hands make sense to her? Nope. So
he tries a variation; does the purple scarf woman know of arthritis? Yes,
she has it herself. Now remember that Fry just asked if she knows of the
condition arthritis - it is the purple scarf woman that gives personal
meaning to his general question. Fry adapts to it and says the spirit is
empathising with her because the spirit had bad arthritis in her hands
towards the end of her earthly life. Cunningly executed cold reading.
Moving on, Fry makes a thing of the spirit constantly struggling for money
during her life. This, of course, applies to a vast majority of most
people today and more so in previous generations. Thus a general statement
that applies to almost everyone. It's also called stock spiel.
He gets no feedback when trying to put forth an alleged love for pineapple
so he tries another path by asking why Brazil is important - something he
immediately expands to the whole of South America when the purple scarf
woman fails to react upon it. After some confusion when Fry thinks this is
pertaining to some other people, the woman tells us that it is she who has
been planning to go to Argentina. Remember that the woman told us that,
Fry asked about Brazil and when that didn't work he tried South America.
Standard cold reading technique.
When the woman asks Fry if the spirit thinks that she should stay home,
since according to Fry it appears to be concerned about her going, he
evades it with a general phrase about free will and then quickly jumps to
a completely different subject; does the purple scarf woman understand
about the spirit wanting her to be cautious about a matter concerning
48,000 crowns? The woman doesn't answer; she obviously doesn't know what
he is talking about.
So he quickly jumps to the next subject; would she be able to understand
that the gentleman who the spirit is trying to "enable" had bowel cancer?
Nope, it doesn't ring any bells. And Fry decides to let go of this
"sitter".
|
1. Did Fry give accurate, detailed and
personal information, pertaining only to the addressed individual?
Fact: Apart from his personal friends, he gave no
such information.
|
|
The next is a
bit tricky. Fry crosses the stage and zooms in on two men to the far left.
He is still on about bowel cancer and he now comes up with the name
"Erik". Now, the couple that are personal friends of his are sitting very
close to these gentlemen and this makes me wonder if the two men are just
a diversion. Because it doesn't take long before Fry's personal friend
declares that he recognizes bowel cancer and Erik. Would Fry be so blunt
that he would use his friends to brush up the terrible hit ratio he got
with the purple scarf woman? He does admit that it's a pain to get
messages for people he knows. Nevertheless, he continues and what do
you think
happens?
First, he scores with some stock spiel about his friend doing things that
the dead man did not have the courage to do. Then he scores with the man
having played guitar and recently picked it up again - which isn't that
odd behaviour for anyone who has played some sort of instrument, but
still. Then he scores regarding a cheque or a bank slip, half-scores about
the man being afraid that he's turning deaf and finally scores about a
sign being showed to the couple on their boating holiday.
All scores - amazing! These people are Fry's personal friends and he now
seems to have regained what he accomplishes on Sixth Sense. Let's continue
to see if he keeps it up.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Don't mess with
a missionary man. Well, Fry ignores Lennox and comes up with something
that has never happened to him before and which he claims is very strange;
he asks the 120-130 people in the audience if anyone would understand if
they had a grandfather who did missionary work. If not, he would easily
have converted this to a grandfather that did some charitable work of any
kind, but Lonely man actually had a grandfather who was a missionary.
Remember; Fry asked, Lonely man told him.
Then Fry checks if Lonely man has any living memory of his grandfather,
which Lonely man says he doesn't. I don't know if Fry gets bolder because
of this, but Fry now asks if his grandfather ever had any dealings with
people who worked with leprosy or a leper colony. Lonely man says no and
Fry is again able to execute a standard cold reading technique; he tells
Lonely man to check with his family. This is actually very neatly done. He
first makes sure that Lonely man has no living memory of his grandfather
and then he can play around quite freely with the grandfather's
activities. The grandson won't know anyway. And most people in the
audience will be convinced that Fry is right and this will of course be
verified by the grandson's later enquiries. But since this information is
not recognizable by Lonely man - and all believers state that it should
be, I'm counting this as a miss.
Fry also lets the grandfather convey some standard phrase about him not
being overly concerned about money - as a missionary he would be more
concerned with teaching Christian values and Western ways. Then he
continues with a financial matter that has played on Lonely man's mind
since June 2004, and Fry actually gets a hit with this one although we are
not informed further in this matter. He ends this passage with the stock
spiel that Lonely man will ruin the quality of his life by worrying about
money. All relative terms that anyone can fit into his or her own line of
thinking. Stock spiel.
Then Fry asks Lonely man if he is annoyed by a crack in a wall or a
ceiling of his home. Lonely man confirms that he has a crack in his car
windscreen. Could Fry by any means have known this before hand? Yes, by
looking out of a window before the séance. All it takes is a glance and to
remember a face. Nevertheless, I'm feeling generous so I'll give him half
a hit for this one. But one thought always comes to mind when I hear these
kinds of "details" that are supposed to verify that it is a loved one's
spirit communicating; do all loved one's turn into imbeciles when they die
and go to spirit? Aren't there more important issues to convey? Aren't
there bigger question marks to straighten out? Apparently not.
He continues with some stock spiel about Lonely man being bothered by
small things (don't we all think that about ourselves from time to time?)
and goes on by telling Lonely man to repair a relationship between a
brother or a son. He then asks Lonely man if he is the one who is doing
the pencil sketches. Nope, he isn't, after which Fry converts this into
urging Lonely man to show interest in some brother's or son's drawing or
sketching of some sort of design with pencil. After that he tells Lonely
man he shouldn't worry about the headaches, he doesn't have a brain tumour
and he shouldn't be preoccupied with the idea of dying. He ends this
"connection" by letting Lonely man know that his grandfather wants him to
read a specific passage in the bible, John 6:3. Lonely man is supposed to
understand why when he reads it. Of course, no one in the audience has a
clue about what this passage is, let alone what it could mean to Lonely
man. And when I looked it up, I became very doubtful that Lonely man will
ever know why he was asked to read it. Here it is:
"So Jesus went on up the mountainside and sat down there with his
disciples." John 6:3; (New English Translation)
Honestly, that's all. I kid you not. Do you have any hopes for Lonely man
understanding this? Do you think that Fry knows what the quotes he tosses
around actually say? But doesn't it sound mysterious and important when
you say it like Fry does?
|
2. Did Fry engage in stock spiels, i.e.
general statements that will apply to almost everyone, or any other cold
reading technique as described by sceptics?
Fact: Yes he did, all the time.
|
|
Next, Fry's
contact is a woman that in character is a sweet lady, kind and gentle but
also a sense of sadness. I know, this fits with your, mine and probably
most parted grandmothers or mothers. It doesn't mean that our grandmothers
and mothers actually were like this in life, but that is how we want to,
and do, and should remember them!
This woman's personality changed a great deal towards the end of her life
and she felt that she couldn't behave as herself. I know, this fits with
your, mine and probably most departed grandmothers or mothers. This is
because no one who dies of "natural causes" remains the same. We get old,
we can't move like we used to, our minds are not as alert as they used to
be. We, sadly but true, fade away.
Anyway, Fry also
senses some names, Elena or Eleanor. It is not stated that those names
pertains to this woman but since only one person "can understand this" and
not a majority of the audience, I take it that the woman knows of an Elena
or Eleanor that has passed. The woman is sitting next to the Swedish
psychic Jorgen "Cry Baby" Gustafsson.
Fry begins this session by suggesting that the passed woman had changed a
great deal, which caused the people who knew her great pain. He asks the
woman next to the psychic if she would understand that the passed woman
had to be restrained or stopped from hurting herself. The woman doesn't
want to use the word "no" so instead she says that the passed woman was
very weak, very old.
Fry doesn't take the hint but goes on about it and suggests the passed
woman had a fit of hysterics and that her arms had to be held down to stop
hurting herself. The woman next to the psychic still doesn't want to use
the word "no" so she states that she thinks it must be another person
because the woman she was thinking of didn't have that kind of strength.
It is obvious that Fry is out on a limb so he tries a variation of it by
saying it feels as though this would have been through fear in some way
but he insists on the restraining part. As this is apparently wrong, the
woman next to the psychic says that she is not sure yet but she wants him
to continue.
And now Fry changes the subject completely. He's now getting a strong
taste of marzipan. And after some thinking, the woman next to the psychic
is starting to realize who he is talking to. Uhm, wait a minute. Let's go
back to the start of this session. The woman next to the psychic
enthusiastically declared "oh, yes" when the names Elena or Eleanor was
combined with a sweet, old lady. But this must have been wrong then! And
how many deceased ladies does this woman next to the psychic have in stock
that was under physical restrain before they died?
This is perhaps the best example of cold reading I've ever witnessed, and
it's ironical because I think that the woman next to the psychic did not
intend to display it for this purpose. She is very clearly demonstrating
how she is struggling to make sense of all the nonsense Fry has provided,
refusing to say "no" to anything, and in the end when she has fitted all
the scraps into her own creative mind and found someone that "it must be"
- you cannot doubt a psychic, she has experienced a psychic medium giving
"exact and accurate information he couldn't possibly have known
beforehand". And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the exposed mind of a
"believer".
Fry ends this turn with some stock spiel, letting the passed woman thank
the woman next to the psychic for not letting anyone say anything bad
about her after she had gone. As if it was common practice for family and
friends to speak ill of the dead. And after this he lets the woman next to
the psychic know that there is nothing wrong with the mirror not hanging
straight, it's the wall that needs to be checked. She just OK's Fry
through and it's hard to tell whether he's actually telling her stuff
she's familiar with or if she just acknowledge his statements.
|
3. Did Fry give information that he by no
means could have known beforehand?
Fact: No, he gave no such information.
|
|
The next
connection is with a person feeling a terrible fear of water, a person
that must have drowned. Among the 120-130 people in the audience, one man
recognizes this and raises his hand. After some successful guessing
regarding gender and age, Fry delivers some stock spiel about the spirit
feeling embarrassed about being where he shouldn't have been where he was
at the time it happened and because he had been told not to go there.
Could the opposite be right when you are talking about a drowning
accident?
Fry delivers another "detail" about the spirit remembering someone who
could impersonate Donald Duck and I actually took an informal poll about
this one. It appears that everyone in our family and all of our friends in
pre-Cartoon Network generations know of someone who can or could
impersonate Donald Duck. I can do it. Can you? Still, it's clever of Fry
to think this stock spiel out.
He tries another one, this time a bit more specific and of course he
flunks; the man does not understand two boys hanging upside down by their
legs. Fry adds the year 1979 to the context and but doesn't manage to get
acceptance even when he concludes that it must be the person who drowned
who had visited an amusement park in 1979. So Fry returns to guilt
feelings regarding the actual drowning, which the man acknowledges.
Then Fry goes for details again. The spirit remembers someone called Peter
quite well, allegedly the drowned lad's age. The man has no clue about
this. So Fry changes this from believing that it was a message for this
Peter, to the drowned lad wanting the man to know that this Peter, whom
the man has no knowledge of, also was in spirit. Fry then goes on, saying
that this Peter, who the man still has no knowledge of, was killed in a
car accident.
Does the man have any interest in snowboarding? Nope. Would he understand
about someone going down a slope of snow on a tin tray? Nope. Well, it
could indicate, Fry says, that it's another memory from some time ago. Go
figure.
So Fry returns and elaborates further on guilt a bit, and ends the session
in this safe area.
|
| |
|
Crossing the
stage, he returns to the purple scarf woman; did someone ask her to invest
money? Nope. In a business plan? Nope. It's something current... Nope. Did
she agree to lend someone money over three or four payments? She doesn't
understand. The interpreter explains and the woman finally says "yes,
yes", but she wants to know if it could have anything to do with a bank.
The interpreter refuses to take it down that lane and insists on keeping
it to the general "lend someone money". The purple scarf woman decides
that one could say that. How accurate...
Fry finds it best to leave the purple scarf woman for good.
|
| |
|
The spirit of a
cross-dresser now appears. Does anybody recognize this? One woman thinks
so, although the man she's thinking of didn't actually wear women's
clothes, he just liked pink.
Well there was
something sad about this man and only five people at the end of his life
understood the agony he was going through, Fry adds. The woman concludes
that it can't be the man she's thinking of then.
But wouldn't the woman understand that very few people attended his
funeral, Fry asks. Yes, she would - she didn't attend herself.
Wasn't he involved in some violence a year before he passed? Nope, not
that the woman knows of but it could have happened...
Not dejected by this obvious cul-de-sac, Fry now tells her that the man
wants to thank her for listening when he told her how frightened he was
shortly before he passed away. The woman is puzzled.
But would she understand that he seemed to be very nervous? He was always
kind of nervous, the woman replies.
And would she understand that she still has contact with two of his other
friends? Not often.
But she knows two other particular friends of his? Knows of them, she
replies. But she at least agrees to let them know he says hello.
Then Fry changes the subject completely. Is she the one that is very good
at arranging flowers? The woman is reluctant to go along with this but she
admits that she likes to arrange flowers, but ...
But isn't it something she has been doing quite recently? Not that she
knows of, no.
Fry now explains that the man just wants to let her know that he was close
to her when she was doing something with flowers or floral effects. Well,
she admits to having attended a funeral. Spotting a way out, Fry asks her
if she had something to do with the floral effects of a funeral. Nope. The
interpreter now tries to tie everything together by stating that she was
in an area where there were some floral effects. But Fry decides not to go
further and ends it by telling her that the man just wanted to let her
know that he was with her on that day. A lot of nothing, it seems.
|
4. Did Fry seek the participation of the
audience in order to convey any messages?
Fact: He started by explicitly asking for the cooperation of the
audience and he also got it all through the séance.
|
|
Next is a woman,
supposedly someone's mother, who passed away after contracting pneumonia.
An elderly lady catches on to this one and Fry puts the remarkable
question to her; was she the one who was concerned about the spirit woman
being cold? The elderly woman nods. What a peculiar and uncommon concern
for someone with pneumonia... And, Fry continues, there was this thing
about taking extra measures to make sure she wasn't cold. Uhm, right, the
common practice is to keep pneumonia patients in freezers?
The spirit then puts the number 87 or 89 in Fry's mind. It is up to the
elderly woman to find something in her or her mother's life to fit that
number. She acknowledges 89. Nothing more comes out of this. Was it an
age, was it her flat or street number?
Fry asks the elderly woman if she will be in a party of six during
Christmas. Maybe, she says. What a pity then, Fry declares, that she only
have five left of those special glasses, which Fry thinks are either
coloured or with a gold rimmed top edge. Now, as I was taking a poll
around the family regarding Donald Duck impersonations, I also asked about
this one. It turns out that coloured or gold rimmed "fine" glasses are
very common, especially among older people. They keep them in display
cabinets and only use them on special occasions. And no, unfortunately
they don't have the full (12) or half (6) set - one or two are missing or
have been broken. Just for fun, check with mum or granny. You'll be
surprised.
The elderly woman addressed by Fry also has glasses like this, but due to
some confusion it is not clear whether she have five or six of them. Fry
implies that a full set has been divided between two but as the elderly
woman starts to explain that her sister had them first, she is cut off by
Fry who is now more interested if she has recently fallen on her right
hip. No, she says.
Fry then asks if she still has an elderly aunt in this life. The
interpreter asks her in Swedish if she still has a sister in this life.
The elderly woman confirms that she still has a sister in this life.
Having established that the elderly woman don't see her sister that often,
but speaks to her, Fry declares that it is the aunt that has taken a fall
and the elderly woman should ask her aunt why she hasn't told her about
this, or the fact that her aunt's family is treating her bad.
After this rather serious advice, Fry asks why her mother is telling him
to indicate the 14th of March. No, the 18th has some significance to her
but not the 14th. Well, her mother is indicating that she must put
something in her diary on the 14th, otherwise she will forget. Slick, very
slick.
After a pause, Fry asks the elderly woman if her mother liked Charlie
Chaplin. The elderly woman confirms this astonishing preference for a
woman that probably was young during Chaplin's glory days. Fry continues
by stating that her mother in fact thought that the silent movies were
better than the modern sound movies. Now, my own preferences are that I
still think that Peter Sellers' movies are better than Jim Carrey's, Clint
Eastwood's are better than Tom Cruise's. It's a "those were the days"
phenomena. Stock spiel. Fry ends the elderly woman session by saying
her mother is thankful for her making sure she was kept warm.
All things must come to an end and after having had yet another stock
spiel session with Lonely man, Fry ends the séance. I don't stay for the
question period after the break - I would probably have been too tempted
to ask him about his experience with wind-instruments.
|
|
©2004-5 the Author doublexposure.co.uk
badpsychics.co.uk |
|
Although he does
it in style and with some creativity, Colin Fry is an obvious cold reader.
But I'm fairly certain that most people attending this live séance thought
it was an amazing experience. So he gave value for money. Even I think
that I got value for my money - my expectations were also met. But does he
talk to dead people? No way.
If you're thinking of attending a live séance with Fry yourself, look out
for the man studying people by the entrance. I sure would like to know if
it was right to give Fry the benefit of the doubt. And when you watch
Sixth Sense or re-runs of it, keep in mind how Fry performs when he's not
in full control of the conditions.
|
|
Most Haunted
Live
| Most Haunted
|
Derek Acorah
|
Colin Fry
| Simon Peters
|
Psychic
Phonelines
Contact
| Legal
| Letters |
Home
|
|
|