Club Evening on 24 August 2009

Loughborough University Bridge Club

Pair	Name	Total	Percentage	1	2	3	4	5	6	8
2	Graham Gerrard/John Lloyd	67	69.79	11		15	7	9	11	14
1	John Glover/Chris Waddington	61	63.54		5	10	12	16	10	8
4	Martin Harrison/Len Cantor	51	53.12	4	9	15		3	9	11
8	Val Challands/Mary Beresford	45	46.88	8	2	8	5	13	9
5	Sheila Wheeler/Malcolm Wheeler	42	43.75	0	7	10	13		9	3
6	Angela Yeo/Janet Lawrence	40	41.67	6	5	8	7	7		7
3	Brian Frost/Yvonne Frost	30	31.25	6	1		1	6	8	8

1	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	4	2	4S	W		-420	4	0
	6	5	4S	W	+1	-450	1	3
	8	1	4S	W	+1	-450	1	3

2	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	4	2	4S	E	+2	-480	1	3
	6	5	4S	E	+2	-480	1	3
	8	1	5D	W	+1	-420	4	0

3	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	4	2	3N	S	+2	460	4	0
	6	5	3N	S	+1	430	2	2
	8	1	5D	S	-1	-50	0	4

4	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	4	2	2S	W		-110	0	4
	6	5	3H	W	-1	100	3	1
	8	1	3H	W	-1	100	3	1

5	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	1	4	1N	S	+1	120	4	0
	5	3	2S	W	6	100	2	2
	8	2	2D	W	+1	-110	0	4

6	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	1	4	4H	E	+1	-650	2	2
	5	3	4H	E	11	-650	2	2
	8	2	4H	W	+1	-650	2	2

7	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	1	4	5C	S	-1	-100	2	2
	5	3	4C	N	10	130	4	0
	8	2	4S	W		-620	0	4

8	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	1	4	3N	S	+1	430	4	0
	5	3	3N	S	8	-50	2	2
	8	2	3H	S	-2	-100	0	4

9	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	2	5	4H	N		420	4	0
	6	4	3H	N	+1	170	2	2
	8	3	3H	N		140	0	4

10	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	2	5	2H	S		110	2	2
	6	4	2S	E	-1	100	0	4
	8	3	3H	S		140	4	0

11	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	2	5	3H	N		140	3	1
	6	4	2S	N	+1	140	3	1
	8	3	1N	W		-90	0	4

12	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	2	5	3S	N	-1	-100	0	4
	6	4	2S	S		110	2	2
	8	3	2S	S	+1	140	4	0

13	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	2	1	2S	W	-1	100	4	0
	3	6	1N	E	+1	-120	2	2
	8	4	2S	W	+1	-140	0	4

14	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	2	1	3C	E	-1	50	1	3
	3	6	4S	W	-2	100	4	0
	8	4	5D	E	-1	50	1	3

15	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	2	1	4H	E		-420	4	0
	3	6	3N	E	+3	-490	0	4
	8	4	3N	E	+2	-460	2	2

16	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	2	1	Av			A	2	2
	3	6	3S	W	-1	100	2	2
	8	4	3S	W	-1	100	2	2

17	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	1	6	1N	E	+2	-150	1	3
	3	2	1N	E	+2	-150	1	3
	8	5	1N	E	+1	-120	4	0

18	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	1	6	3H	E		-140	2	2
	3	2	4H	W		-420	0	4
	8	5	4H	E	-1	50	4	0

19	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	1	6	3S	S	+2	200	4	0
	3	2	3C	S		110	0	4
	8	5	1N	N	+1	120	2	2

20	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	1	6	2N	W	-1	100	3	1
	3	2	1N*	W	+1	-380	0	4
	8	5	2H	E	-1	100	3	1

21	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	4	3	3N	N	+1	630	4	0
	5	1	2D	N	10	130	0	4
	8	6	3H	N	+1	170	2	2

22	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	4	3	3N	W	+2	-660	3	1
	5	1	6N	W	12	-1440	0	4
	8	6	3N	W	+2	-660	3	1

23	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	4	3	3S	S	+1	170	4	0
	5	1	4S	N	-2	-200	0	4
	8	6	2S	S		110	2	2

24	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	4	3	4S	W	+2	-480	4	0
	5	1	6N	W	12	-990	0	4
	8	6	3N	W	+3	-490	2	2

25	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	3	1	3N	E		-600	2	2
	5	4	3N	E	8	100	4	0
	6	2	3N	E	+1	-630	0	4

26	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	3	1	4H	W		-620	2	2
	5	4	3N	W	9	-600	4	0
	6	2	3N	E	+3	-690	0	4

27	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	3	1	5S	E		-450	0	4
	5	4	5C*	S	11	550	4	0
	6	2	5H*	W	-1	100	2	2

28	NS	EW	Con	By	Tr	Score	NS	EW
	3	1	Av			A	2	2
	5	4	2H	W	9	-140	1	3
	6	2	4H	W	-1	50	3	1

Updated by Graham Gerrard on 24 August 2009 at 22:58