Gender and Health
Men have a lower life expectancy than women: 75.1 years compared with 80.0 years (D0H, 2001 b). Men are more likely to die from cancer, heart disease, HIV, accidents and suicide than women (D0H, 1998). Men are more likely to take risks with their health than women — on average they drink more alcohol, smoke more cigarettes, and take more drugs (c). They use less sun cream and are involved in more accidents (D0H, 2001 a). Men also have less contact with the health services than women. In response to the question ‘Have you consulted your GP in the last two weeks?’ 19 per cent of women and only 13 per cent of men said yes. The gender difference was even more pronounced for men under the age of 45 (10 per cent of men compared to 20 per cent of women) (ONS, 1998). Interestingly, other issues of inequality are more pronounced in men than women. In men, social class based on employment is the most important influence on early death. To put it brutally, the less you earn, the sooner you die. For women however, although there is still an effect of income on early death, it is much weaker (Sacker et aI., 2000).
The puzzle for health workers is to understand why men have worse health and die younger, and why they make less use of the health services. Recent initiatives by the UK government (Yamey, 2000) have acknowledged that the biggest health inequality is between men and women. They are attempting to increase men’s involvement in general health promotion such as smoking cessation, and also to deal with specific problems such as prostate cancer. It might be that the problem with men’s health is that the area is far less defined than women’ health which is focused around reproduction.
According to a medical textbook from the 19th century: ‘childbearing is essentially necessary to the physical health and long life, the mental happiness, the development of the affections and whole character of women. Woman exists for the sake of the womb’ (Holbrook, 1871, pp. 13—14; cited in Gallant et al., 1997). Attitudes have changed and, supported by policy and legislation, women s health is near the top of the health researcher’s agenda.
In
industrialized societies today men die earlier than women but women have poorer
health than men (Macintyre and Hunt, 1997). In 1996 in the UK boys had a life
expectancy of 74.4 years compared with 79.7 years for girls. This excess
mortality of 5.3 years in males in 1996 increased over the course of the
twentieth century from only 3.9 years in 1900—1910. However, the evidence
suggests that from the Paleolithic period to the industrial revolution men
lived longer than women, 40 years as compared to 35. Also, in less developed
countries (e.g. India, Bangladesh, Nepal and Afghanistan) women still live
longer than men (WHO, 1989). Thus, there are significant historical and
cultural differences in gender-related health. To complicate the picture
further, the SES—mortality gradient appears to be steeper for men than for
women while illness rates, treatment rates, absenteeism and prescription drug
use are generally higher for women (Macintyre and Hunt, 1997).
Women
have higher morbidity rates but lower mortality rates. (See
recent world data from New Scientist). Women suffer more non-fatal chronic
illnesses and more acute illnesses. They also make more visits to their family
physicians and spend more time in hospital. Women suffer more from
hypertension, kidney disease and autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid
arthritis and lupus (Litt, 1993). They also suffer twice the rate of
depression. Men, on the other hand, have a shorter life expectancy, suffer more
injuries, suicides, homicides and heart disease.
Psychosocial
and lifestyle differences are likely to play a major role in mediating
gender-related health differences. In industrialized societies women suffer
more from poverty, stress from relationships, childbirth, rape, domestic
violence, sexual discrimination, lower status work, concern about weight and
the strain of dividing attention between competing roles of parent and worker.
Financial barriers may prevent women, more than men, from engaging in healthier
lifestyles and desirable behaviour change (O’Leary and Helgeson, 1997).
Social
support derived from friendships, intimate relationships and marriage, although
significant, appears to be of less positive value to women than to men.
Although physical and mental well-being generally benefit from social support,
women often provide more emotional support to their families than they receive.
Thus, the loss of a spouse has a longer and more devastating effect on the
health of men than on that of women (Stroebe and Stroebe, 1983). The burden of
caring for an elderly, infirm or dementing family member also tends to be
greater for females in the family than for males, especially daughters
(Grafstrom, 1994). While the health of women is a focus for renewed efforts in
health care, the health of men cannot be taken for granted. Men are more likely
to suffer diseases of the cardiovascular system, more often suffer a violent
death and die younger.
Biological explanations for
the difference between men and women for CHD point to the role of Oestrogen,
that reduces blood clotting and cholesterol levels, whereas testosterone
increases clotting (McGill and Stern 1979).
Men respond to stresses in a way that is biologically more dangerous
than it is for women. They show, under
laboratory conditions, greater stress hormone levels, blood pressure and
cholesterol levels, than women.
However, these differences are in part due to cultural factors. Women who take on traditionally male
stressful jobs tend to exhibit similar biological responses as men (Lundberg et al, 1981). Men are more likely to be overweight, smoke more frequently
cigarettes containing higher levels of nicotine and tar, eat less healthily and
drink more heavily than women (Reddy et al. 1992). They are more likely to work in unhealthy environments and be
subjected to a greater risk of accidents.
This study
explored the extent to which college men and women of various racial and ethnic
groups differ in their health beliefs and behaviors. Exploratory factor
analyses of survey responses from a diverse sample of 1,816 undergraduate
students (60% women, aged 18-72 yrs) identified 21 items in six cohesive
domains: Diet; Anger and Stress;
Preventive Care; Medical Compliance; Substance Use; and Beliefs about
Masculinity. Analyses of variance explored group differences across these
domains. Findings revealed consistent gender differences, with men engaging in riskier behaviours
and holding riskier beliefs than women. Main effects for ethnicity were also
observed, but only for the diet domain was a gender by ethnicity interaction found. Courtenay,-Will-H; McCreary,-Donald-R; Merighi,-Joseph-R Journal-of-Health-Psychology. 2002 May; Vol 7(3): 219-231
Use
of health services
The graph depicts how physician contacts vary with
age
and with another important factor, the patient’s gender. Women
have a higher rate of physician contacts than men (USDHHS, 1987, 1991). This
gender difference does not exist in childhood, but begins to appear during
adolescence. Much of the gender difference in physician contacts in early adulthood
certainly results from the medical care women require when they become
pregnant. But even when physician visits for pregnancy and childbirth are not
counted, women still use medical services more than men (Cleary, Mechanic,
& Greenley, 1982; Verbrugge, 1985). The reasons for this difference in use
of medical care are unclear, but researchers have offered several possible
explanations (Verbrugge, 1980, 1985). One obvious explanation is that women may
simply develop more illnesses that require medical attention. Although men are
more likely than women to develop fatal chronic diseases, women show higher
rates of medical drug use and illness from both acute conditions, such as
respiratory infections, and from nonfatal chronic diseases, such as arthritis
and migraine headache. Another explanation is that men are more hesitant than
women to admit having symptoms and to seek medical care for the symptoms they
experience. This difference in responding to symptoms probably reflects
sex-role stereotypes; that is, American society encourages men more than women
to ignore pain and to be tough and independent. However Basbaum et al (2002) has found that males are better at
tolerating pain than females because of a key difference in how the sexes
transmit pain messages. A protein
called GIRK2 plays a major role in pain sensation and drug sensitivity in
males, but is not as important in females. Removing GIRK2 means the sexes
become equal in their ability to withstand pain, experiments on mice showed.
Gender differences in health from early to mid adolescence
(Sweeting and West)
This analysis used self-report health measures obtained at 11, 13 and 15 in
order to test the hypothesis that there is an emerging or increasing female
excess in general ill-health and physical symptoms, as well as psychological
distress, during early to mid adolescence. Generally high levels of health
problems at age 11 tended to increase with age, these increases being
greater for females than males, not only in respect of psychological
distress and 'malaise' symptoms, but also limiting illness, 'poor'
self-rated health, headaches, stomach problems and dizziness. The result, by
age 15, was the emergence of a female excess in general ill-health and
'malaise', and a substantial strengthening of a sex differential in
'physical' symptoms and psychological distress already apparent at 11 years.
Diet
Robinson and Killen (1995)
found that adolescent boys of all ethnic groups (Hispanics, Asian Americans,
African Americans, and Whites) ate significantly more high-fat foods than did
adolescent girls. A number of environmental factors may differentially
influence male and female eating behaviors, such as gender role stereotypes and
their relationship to dietary behaviors. For example, Perry et al. (1987) found
that a program design that emphasized weight and physical appearance as
secondary benefits of healthy eating was more relevant for adolescent girls
(compared with boys). They suggested that involvement of boys might be
enhanced by incorporating male sports role models and increasing emphasis on
improved strength, endurance, and performance as a result of healthy eating
habits. Similarly, Kumanyika and Charleston (1992) found that females were
much more likely to volunteer for their church-based weight-loss program than
males. These studies suggest that additional research is needed to better
understand how genetic and environmental factors may differentially affect
male versus female adolescent eating behaviors.
Blaxter (1990) found women were more likely to define health in terms of
personal relationships. In their study of working-class women’s views of
cancer, Murray and McMillan (1988) also found that the women made repeated
reference to their families when describing the disease. For them, health and
illness were not simply characteristics of their individual body but rather
involved their relationships with others.
Campbell et al. (1992) investigated attitudes
towards condom use. Participants were
393 unmarried, heterosexual American undergraduates. The questionnaire consisted of twenty items, which assessed
comfort and convenience, protective effectiveness, interpersonal aspects and
sexual sensation. The results showed that women had more positive attitudes
towards condoms. Men were concerned about the effects of condoms on sexual
sensation. Women worried more about getting a sexually transmitted disease from
a new partner. For women, past condom use was best predicted by positive
general attitudes towards condoms as well as less negative attitudes towards
the effects of condom use on sexual sensation. For men, feeling positive about
the interpersonal aspects of condom use as well as having positive general
attitudes towards condoms were significant predictors of past condom use. For
both women and men, intended condom use in the future was best predicted by
positive general attitudes towards condoms and positive views about the
interpersonal aspects of condom use. In addition, those students who had had
fewer sexual partners were more likely to say that they would use a condom in
the future. For women only, increased worry about contracting a sexually
transmitted disease also predicted intention to use condoms in the future.
Murray and Jarrett (1985) examined gender differences in perceptions of
health and health maintenance. They conducted detailed interviews with a sample
of young people and found that young men were more likely to define health in
terms of fitness and health maintenance in terms of physical activity, which
improved their ability to perform. Young women preferred diet and weight
control which improved their physical image. Other studies (e.g. Hayes and
Ross, 1987) have found that concern for bodily appearance is the most important
reason for physical activity among females. However, this concern with bodily
image is closely linked with social position.
In their survey Oygard and Anderssen found that level of education was
positively associated with extent of participation in physical activity among
females but not among males. In reviewing this finding, they refer to the
suggestion that concern with the body is more common among those belonging to
the cultural elite who are more anxious about their appearance and their ‘body
for others’ (Bourdieu, 1984, p. 213). Oygard and Anderssen concluded: ‘For
females in higher social positions, it may be of importance to show others who
they are by developing healthy and “delicate” bodies, i.e. they are more
concerned with the inner (being healthy) and outer body (being attractive) than
females in lower social positions’ (1998, p. 65). However, they also added that
the lesser involvement of less educated females may be due to them having
limited access to leisure facilities. They found little relationship between
education and physical activity among males and suggest that this may reflect
the greater promotion of male sporting activities and the greater integration
of physical activity into male culture.
Lewinsohn et al (2002) Identified problematic eating behaviours
and attitudes in young men and compared them with those of young women. A
community sample of 1,056 14-18 yr olds completed a questionnaire that
contained the Drive for Thinness, Bulimia, and Body Dissatisfaction subscales
of the Eating Disorder inventory, as well as probes for inappropriate
compensatory behaviours, excessive exercise, and episodes of binge eating. Results
show a 5-factor structure fit both male and female samples. Women had
substantially elevated scores on all of the factors except excessive exercise, for which men had significantly
higher scores. The absolute proportion of men and women wanting or having
sought treatment was very low. However, at comparable levels of problematic
eating behaviours, women were more likely to have sought treatment than men. Lewinsohn,-Peter-M; Seeley,-John-R; Moerk,-Kirstin-C; Striegel-Moore,-Ruth-H International-Journal-of-Eating-Disorders. 2002 Dec; Vol 32(4):
426-440
Graham (1996) considered the sex differences in
the prevalence of smoking across Europe between 1950 and 1990. During this
period there was a consistent decline in the prevalence of smoking among men
from about 70—90% to about 30—50%. However, among women the same period saw a
rise in the prevalence of smoking followed by a slow decline reaching 20—40% in
1990. Women from professional backgrounds led the initial rise in prevalence,
but they have also led the decline such that today smoking in Britain is more
common among women from poorer backgrounds.
In a detailed qualitative and sociometric study of friendship patterns
of a sample of Scottish schoolchildren, Michell and Amos (1997) found evidence
that gender differences in the meaning of smoking and how it was intertwined
with issues of style and social identity. Girls identified at the top of the
pecking order and who projected an image of high self-esteem were more likely
to smoke. These girls were more often described as ‘good-looking’ and being
attractive to boys. They often hung out in the park after school rather than
participating in organized activities. These girls did not feel under pressure
to smoke. Rather they adopted smoking as part of the image of being cool,
rebellious and sophisticated. It was seen as part of the ‘top’ girl package. One
11-year-old girl said: ‘You don’t want to be seen as a wee sad people.’ To
avoid this image she would wear her short skirt, jewellery and makeup and would
smoke.
Admittedly in this study there was a small minority of girls who were
low in the pecking order and who smoked. These girls did admit that they had
felt bullied or coerced into smoking or that they smoked in order to be like
the ‘top’ girls. These girls had poor social skills and low self-esteem. They
felt they were not responsible for smoking themselves. For ‘top’ boys the
desire to smoke was less clear-cut. Michell and Amos (1997) suggested that they
occupied an ambivalent position since smoking conflicted with their desire to
be fit. Smoking was less important because they had other means, especially
sports, of claiming a top position.
An important although neglected aspect of this study is the broader
socio-cultural context within which the young people lived. The two schools
investigated in this study had a varied catchment area, which included private
and public housing. However, the fact that 50% of the students were receiving
free school meals, the Glasgow average, would suggest that a large proportion
came from lower SES backgrounds. It is not simply that all ‘top’ girls smoked
but rather those within a particular subculture did.
Wearing et al. (1994) in their review have drawn attention to the
importance of the socio-cultural context. They refer to an American study by
Lesko (1988), which identified two subcultures in a school she studied. There
were the ‘rich and popular’ girls who were fashionably and expensively dressed
and fitted with the classic ‘good girl’ image. Conversely, there were the ‘burn
outs’ who challenged school discipline and enjoyed ‘hanging out’. This latter
group of girls smoked. In commenting on this study Wearing et al. (1994) note:
‘Smoking . . . for the “burn outs” is a
leisure activity which symbolizes resistance to the passive, sweet tempered,
modest, restrained, domestic identity associated with traditional female
identity and which for the “rich and popular” girls is being constructed in
adolescence through school and leisure’ (p. 632).
Smoking in girls has also been explained in terms of controlling weight.
Adolescence is the period when girls become particularly aware of society’s
emphasis on body size. Teenage girls are particularly concerned about being
overweight. Smoking would seem to be one strategy used to control weight gain.
Charlton (1984) in a large survey of British
teenagers found that girls were much more likely to agree that smoking
controlled weight. In a survey of a large sample of US students in seven to ten
grades (11—15 years old), French et al. (1994) found a strong association
between various measures of dieting and smoking among girls but not among boys.
Girls who reported symptoms of eating disorder, had tried to lose weight,
feared weight gain or reported a strong desire to remain thin were more likely
to report smoking. In the USA there is evidence that this belief is
particularly pronounced among white girls. Heckler (1985) found that obesity is
more acceptable in black culture and Camp et al. (1993) found in a survey of teenagers that white girls more
frequently agreed that smoking helps control body weight. (Most
women feel too fat).
The
character of social activities enjoyed by teenage boys and girls needs also to
be considered. While boys often remain involved in sport and other organized
activities, girls become more involved in less organized activities. In a
survey of English teenagers (Murray et al., 1983; Swan et al., 1990) it was
found that smoking was more common among girls who got involved in such
activities. Smoking for these girls had a variety of positive social meanings
including affirming social bonds with their peers, asserting their adult status
and regulating time.
Etter et al (2002) compared the distributions of smoking-related
variables and the size of associations between these variables in men and
women. 2,934 daily smokers who volunteered for a smoking cessation trial were
surveyed. Follow-up occurred after 7 mo in 2,456 people (84%). Women smoked
less than men (18 vs 22 cigarettes per day), had lower confidence in their ability
to refrain from smoking, used more frequently the strategy defined as coping
with the temptation to smoke and reported more drawbacks of smoking. There was
no gender difference in the distribution of smokers by stage of change. At
follow-up, smoking cessation rates were similar in men and women. Intention to
quit, quit attempts in the previous year and a more frequent use of self-change
strategies predicted smoking cessation and were associated with tobacco
dependence in both sexes. A more frequent use by women of coping strategies
suggests that some women are self-restrained smokers who control their
smoking permanently. This could explain lower smoking rates in women. The size
of associations between smoking-related variables was similar in men and women.
Even though there were gender differences in the distributions of some smoking-related variables,
associations between these variables were similar in men and women. Etter,-Jean-Francois; Prokhorov,-Alexander-V; Perneger,-Thomas-V Addiction. 2002 Jun; Vol 97(6): 733-743