Why is colonization such
a preoccupation for you?
It's evident, in various
guises, in Capella's
Golden Eyes, The
Insider, Aztec
Century and Mortal
Remains. Christopher
Evans: Interesting
question--I hadn't
considered this until you
pointed it out! It's
culture-clash, probably,
highlighting the ways in
which people often try
but fail to understand
one another due to
differences in their
upbringings. In science
fiction you can often
make these differences
really stark.
Male/female
relationships, I've
noticed, are always
convincingly drawn in
your work (rare for
sci-fi). Is this
something you have
especially focussed on?
Christopher
Evans: Absolutely. My
aim has always been to
make the characters in my
stories as
three-dimensional as
possible whatever I'm
writing. In my view
science fiction demands
this no less than any
other kind of
fiction--though I suspect
this is still something
of a minority view within
the field itself. It was
always a big source of
frustration to me to read
sf which might be hugely
inventive of concepts but
had no convincing human
dimension. I'm much more
interested in how rounded
characters might react to
whatever weirdness I
throw their way in my
fiction. As for
male/female relationships
in particular--well, half
the human race is female,
so you're restricting
yourself enormously if
you don't write about
them. I'm interested in
the interplay between our
private and public lives.
Can
you tell us how the Other
Edens project
arose and why did it come
to an end after the third
anthology in 1989?
Christopher
Evans: The first Other
Edens anthology was
conceived as a showcase
for the work of some of
the best-known British sf
writers. It was published
to coincide with the 1987
World Science Fiction
Convention, which was
being held in Brighton.
At the time there were
very few outlets for
short sf stories in the
UK. Traditionally a lot
of sf writers begin their
careers by publishing
short stories before they
move on to novels, and
Rob Holdstock and I hoped
to encourage new voices
as well. We were helped
in this by the enthusiasm
of Jane Johnson, who was
the editor at Unwin
Hyman. And we did manage
to generate plenty of
interest for a while.
Unfortunately original
anthologies seldom sell
well, no matter how
distinguished the
cast-list. After the
third anthology it just
wasn't economically
sustainable, as well as
too time-consuming for
Rob and myself: we had
our own fiction to write.
But both of us consider
it to have been very
worthwhile, as well as
fun to do.
In
Chimeras
(1992) - a book of linked
stories - you examine art
and notions of artistic
inspiration. You've also
written a fair bit on
sci-fi and fantasy art.
Why the special interest
in this subject?
Christopher
Evans: I've no
special expertise about
fantasy art, and, to be
quite honest, no special
interest in it. The texts
I wrote for the art books
were paid jobs of
journalistic work done
when I was a full-time
free-lance writer who
needed to earn a crust.
That's not to denigrate
them, simply to say I did
them because I was
commissioned. Chimeras
didn't spring directly
out of this work at all.
For me the book is more
about creativity in
general than visual art
in particular. I wanted
to explore the tensions
between everyday life and
the private obsessions of
the artist. If anything,
what inspired it was the
Cyril Connolly quote:
"The enemy of art is
the pram in the
hall."
Your
award-winning alternative
history novel Aztec
Century
(1993) is probably your
best known work. Why did
you choose that
particular culture and
the historical events
concerning Cortez to play
around with?
Christopher
Evans: The germ of Aztec
Century came from a
Barbara Tuchman book, The
March of Folly, an
almost throwaway line
about Cacama, the nephew
of the Aztec emperor who
was immediately hostile
to the arriving
Spaniards, and what might
have happened had the
Aztecs attacked them
there and then rather
than waiting until much
later, when it was too
late. I knew nothing
about the Aztecs, but the
more I read, the more
fascinating their story
became to me and the more
the novel began
coalescing in my mind.
You
have a lot of fun in Aztec
Century
with reverse cultural
imperialism - cola-cocao,
Acapulco films and
Mexican fast food chains
for instance. Was the
Americanization of
British culture or indeed
globalization an
underlying concern of the
book?
Christopher
Evans: Mostly it was
an excuse for a few
jokes. It seemed logical
that any dominant power
in the 20th century would
also have commercial and
cultural dominance in a
similar fashion to the
USA today. Alternative
histories encourage this
sort of backhand swiping
at the world we actually
inhabit, and if it raises
a few smiles in the
reader then it's fine by
me. There's even a
Margaret Thatcher joke
buried in there
somewhere--she ended up
running a chain of
supermarkets.
How
difficult was it writing Aztec
Century
from a female
perspective?
Christopher
Evans: How successful
it was is perhaps the key
question--and one that
can't really be answered
by me because I'm a man.
You
handle the nuts and bolts
of writing very adroitly
- the complex point of
view in The
Insider;
and the multiple first
person/third person
narrative shifts in Mortal
Remains
(1995) are particularly
well done. You've also
penned a guide: Writing
Science Fiction.
Is the practical side of
writing something that
has always interested
you?
Christopher
Evans: The
Insider was an
extremely challenging
book to write in terms of
viewpoint, and if I made
it look easy then I'm
delighted because I
certainly don't want the
reader to be bothered by
any technical narrative
problems that I might
have experienced in the
writing of it. The hard
graft is in creating the
illusion that the machine
runs smoothly. Mortal
Remains was a
deliberate attempt to
write a multiple
viewpoint space opera
using the contrivance of
the portable womb to
shift the action around.
I'm dissatisfied with
this novel for reasons
other than structural
ones. I think I'm at my
best when my work is
directly related in some
way to the real
present-day world. Writing
Science Fiction was
another book that was
commissioned by a
publisher and it was a
fascinating exercise that
enabled me to put my
thoughts about writing
fiction, and in
particular science
fiction, into coherent
form. At the time I was
also doing a lot of book
reviews, which are
another means of getting
your own ideas in order
about your work. But you
have to be careful not to
over-indulge yourself in
this sort of thing and
I've deliberately backed
away from all that over
the last fifteen years.
Too much self
consciousness can be
hazardous to your
creative health.
Has
your teaching career had
an influence on your
writing at all?
Christopher
Evans: It's kept me
sane since I have other
people to bounce off.
Particularly the
students, who'll always
keep you grounded. I
wasn't really suited to
full-time writing--not
enough stimulus from
outside. Teaching has
also made me financially
solvent so that I no
longer have to write
books just to pay the
bills. Only the ones I
want to write.
In
terms of situation and
structure your novels are
all very different. Do
you think this diversity
has been disadvantageous
to your literary career,
in that it's quite hard
to define a 'typical'
Christopher Evans novel?
Christopher
Evans: Yes, it
undoubtedly has been
disadvantageous from a
commercial point of view.
My publishers would have
dearly loved a follow-up
to Aztec Century,
and it probably would
have done wonders for my
sales figures if I had
written it. But so few
sequels are as good as
the originals. I don't
have a lot of time for my
writing, so I have to
make it count. I prefer
to try something new,
something that I hope
will stretch me as a
writer--though ideally
not to breaking point!
Finally,
what do you make of the
contemporary state of
British sci-fi and are
there any authors out
there who are currently
impressing you?
Christopher
Evans: The sf scene
seems pretty healthy in
Britain at the moment,
though I can't speak as
any sort of authority. I
have to confess that I
read very little science
fiction these days.
Haven't done for years.
It's not a deliberate
policy, more a question
of failing to get the
same buzz from the stuff
as I used to when I was
younger. Much of my
reading is non-fiction,
often background research
for something I'm trying
to write. As far as
fiction is concerned I'm
a lot more interested in
what non-genre writers
are doing. So recently
I've been reading novels
by Richard Powers,
Douglas Coupland,
Jonathan Coe and have
finally caught up with
Raymond Chandler. The one
sf writer who has really
impressed me is Ted
Chiang, whose short story
collection The Story
of Your Life I'm
currently reading. The
title piece is
first-rate,
quintessentially sf in
that it's conceptually
original and challenging,
but it also manages to be
well written and humane.
Cheers
Chris, thanks for taking
time out to answer these
questions.
Capella's
Golden Eyes,
The
Insider,
In
Limbo, Chimeras,
Aztec
Century
and Mortal
Remains
are all available through
Amazon.
ŠAnthony
Brockway 2004
BACK
|