AIRPLAN - Air Refueling Planning
Air Refueling Planning_v3 - Air-to-Air Refuelling Planning & Tanker Fleet Optimization Software by AIRPLANRapidly determines the optimum utilization of Tanker & Receiver Aircraft in virtually any Scenario or Air Campaign and generates comprehensive planning & refuelling data
Author & Developer: Group Captain Derek K. Empson MBE RAF (Retired) - NOTE: Major Site up-date on 1st June 2006
© Copyright D. K. Empson 2005/06. E-mail: airplan @ air-refueling.com or airplan@military-airplanner.com
Link to the AIRPLAN Military-Airplanner Suite
Click for Air Refueling Planning_v3 input & output screens
Air-to-Air Refuelling (AAR) - or Air Refueling (AR) - is routinely carried out by the United States Air Force (USAF), US Navy, US Marine Corps, US Army, Air Force Reserves and Air National Guard. Some fourteen other land-based and ship-based air forces of NATO and other nations around the world also regularly engage in AAR during air campaigns and day-to-day operations to increase their operational capability. Such air forces include the UK Royal Air Force, the Royal Australian Air Force, the French Air Force, the German Air Force and the Italian Air Force, to name but a few. Many of the naval and army air arms of these and other nations (e.g. the UK Royal Navy) also use air-to-air refuelling to extend their operational capability. Furthermore, civilian companies such as Omega Air, North American Tactical Aviation and Evergreen, are already or are planning to offer air tanker support to supplement hard-pressed and (in some cases) ageing military tanker fleets.
The complexity of optimizing tanker fleet composition and employment, and the planning of actual air-to-air refuelling missions which can take place in an infinite variety of scenarios, is well recognised. The need for a user-friendly yet powerful planning tool to provide rapid, accurate answers to such planning demands led to the development of Air-Refueling Planning_v3 (short title, AIRPLAN AAR). This unique software package greatly simplifies, speeds up and increases the efficiency with which virtually any air refuelling operation can be planned and the size and composition of any tanker fleet can be optimized.
Unrivalled in its speed and ease of use, Air Refueling Planning_V3.8, a much-expanded version brought into use in March 2006, has three times the capacity and even greater versatility than earlier versions. The increased capability of the latest software package has been assisted by user feedback, indicating that the designer of the Air-Refueling Planning (and the other AIRPLAN Suite programs) is sensitive to the evolving needs of AIRPLAN customers. Delivery of the AIRPLAN Suite anywhere in the world is normally possible within 28 days, the time taken to obtain the necessary UK export licence.
Air Refuelling Planning_v3 is an essential, rapid planning tool for AR operations planning staff, for military aircraft manufacturers, Departments or Ministries of Defence, Aircraft Procurement Departments, Air Operations Centres ashore or afloat, Operations Analysis & War Gaming Establishments and Air Force / Joint Service Colleges. It is an essential tool for any organisation that has a need to evaluate or demonstrate the consequences of AAR, or that has responsibility for planning air refuelling operations or selecting tanker replacements and optimizing the size and composition of air tanker fleets.
Air Refuelling Planning_v3 is designed around AR operational procedures agreed by nations in the international forum for air refuelling, the Air Refueling Systems Advisory Group (ARSAG). An important AAR reference document is Allied Tactical Publication ATP56A. This can be downloaded via the Internet (Web Site: www.arsaginc.com/ATP56A.htm ). Other useful references are ATP-34 and AIRCENT Manual 80-6.
Tanker fleet size and employment optimization (having tankers well suited to a nation's needs, having enough crews, knowing how many tankers will be required in any air campaign or mission scenario, and deploying and employing them in the most suitable manner) is clearly important; but without proper calculation 'tools' it becomes an extremely difficult, complex and time-consuming process. This is why AIRPLAN AAR was designed - it makes tanker fleet planning, employment and optimisation calculations quick and easy for anyone reasonably familiar with AR operations to perform.
The initial planning of any major air campaign or operation involving AAR presents planners with many questions. Which is the most suitable tanker type to employ (where there is a choice)? How many tankers will be required? How best to employ them? Are there enough aircraft crews to sustain the required daily rate of effort? How much fuel will have to be pre-positioned at air bases? How many AAR transfers will be required? How frequently will receivers have to take on fuel and what quantities? Many such questions require time-consuming calculations to derive accurate answers: AIRPLAN AAR is designed to make this entire process quick and simple to complete.
AIRPLAN Air Refuelling Planning_v3 is a versatile, user-friendly software application for laptops, desktops and servers that greatly simplifies the initial planning of all air refuelling operations by land-based or sea-based airplanes of any type, both tanker and receiver.
Air Refuelling Planning_v3 is an essential tool for nations studying the replacement of existing tanker fleets, or the first time acquisition of air tankers. It can evaluate and compare all types of tankers in virtually any type of AAR scenario. Air Refuelling Planning_v3 can also be an invaluable tool for students and staff at Air Force Staff Colleges and for similar operations and resource planning Courses of Instruction.
AIRPLAN AAR can be used for fixed-wing aircraft, rotor craft (e.g. V-22) and helicopters. It can also be used to generate refuelling schedules on the ground at air bases. Air Refuelling Planning_v3 is one of five applications that make up the AIRPLAN Suite of software that provides users with a universal Fleet Optimization and Air Campaign Planning software package of unmatched versatility. It can quickly carry out all those difficult but essential calculations that many other so-called "mission planning" packages do not even attempt.
For a better appreciation of the capability, versatility and value of AIRPLAN AAR, it is helpful to have some appreciation of the purpose of all five programs of the AIRPLAN Suite. The suite consists of the following programs:
The Military Air Operations Planner (AIRPLAN MAOP)
The Mixed
/ Multi-fleet Analyser (AIRPLAN MFA)
The Missions Database (AIRPLAN MDB)
Air Refuelling Planning (AIRPLAN AAR)
Airlift
(AIRPLAN Airlift) (Note: This is a very
recent addition to the AIRPLAN Suite that is only just becoming available)
The functions of the first three are summarised
on the AIRPLAN Suite
page of this web site (see link, top right on
this page). After studying this page, in which
we explain and illustrate Air
Refuelling Planning_v3,
we suggest you then take a few minutes to read about the remainder of the
AIRPLAN Suite. To study the AIRPLAN Suite
in greater depth, please take time to visit the
AIRPLAN Military-Airplanner
web site - url:
http://www.military-airplanner.com/ and email
airplan@military-airplanner.com
for a report.
Existing Users of the AIRPLAN Suite including Air Refuelling Planning_v3
Users of the AIRPLAN Suite include: the United States Army (mainly to calculate major deployment closure times, with and without air refuelling); the Aeronautical Systems Center at Wright Patterson; the Defence Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO) and the Department of Defence, Australia; the Ministry of Defense (DGA) France; and five well known military aircraft manufacturers and defence systems companies in the United States, the UK and Australia. Commercial customers can use AIRPLAN as an aid to aircraft design, operations analysis (OA) and aircraft sales/marketing. The AIRPLAN Suite, including AIRPLAN AAR, is presently being sought by other organisations and by military educational and training establishments for whom it is potentially an invaluable fleet sizing, operations planning, OA and war-gaming tool for directing staff and students, alike.
(Please continue to scroll down for a full description & illustration of
AIRPLAN AAR)The Air Refuelling Planning (AAR) program in more detail
For any given air campaign or mission scenario,
AIRPLAN AAR can calculate the minimum number of tankers required and their optimum employment or deployment. It can be used to evaluate the effect of employing different tanker types in any given scenario. It provides guidance on where fuel transfers should take place, and the total mass of fuel required both by receivers, by tankers themselves, and at the tanker base. Where tankers could be employed or deployed in more than one way, it automatically evaluates and quantifies the air effort that each method demands, including the sorties, flight hours and fuel consumed. This enables planners to choose whichever solution is best for their particular situation. It carries out all these calculations for all types of tanker and receiver aircraft and AAR operation, and will quantify the comparative capabilities of different types of tanker. When used in conjunction with the AIRPLAN Suite Military Air Operations Planner (MAOP) or Mixed / Multi- Fleet Analyser (MFA), the planner can also calculate the minimum number of crews, receivers and tankers required to sustain defined operations or an air campaign for any given period, at any stated sortie rate. This will reveal whether crews or a/c are the constraining factor on sortie rates. If it reveals a shortage of crews or aircraft, these AIRPLAN programs in combination will the enable the operation planner to calculate what can be achieved with the forces that are available.For any given air campaign or mission scenario,
AIRPLAN AAR will also enable aircraft manufacturers and military aircraft procurement departments to compare the air refuelling capabilities, determine the minimum necessary fleet size and optimum composition, and quantify the cost-effectiveness of different tanker types and fleet compositions, depending on the types of operation regarded as being most essential. AIRPLAN AAR identifies and calculates tanker and receiver aircraft and fuel transfer solutions for six main air refuelling mission types (and many more sub-types), as will be described and illustrated below where you can see the actual AIRPLAN AAR input and output data screens.AIRPLAN AAR Program Arrangement
AIRPLAN AAR is arranged in eleven modular sub-programs. Six of these calculate solutions for the main, different types of air-to-air refuelling operation that users may need to plan or evaluate. The seventh and eighth calculate Block Speed and Fuel Consumption (these latter calculation tables are also for use with AIRPLAN MAOP, MFA and Airlift). Three modules are amendable databases in which to store key, receiver and tanker aircraft performance data - also tanker aircraft store fitments and fuel transfer capabilities.
AAR calculation programs contained in the AIRPLAN Air Refuelling Planning_v3 application briefly summarised, as follows:
Receiver Aircraft Database. The user
can enter and store relevant performance data for up to 18 fixed-wing and rotary-wing AAR-capable receiver aircraft.
Aircraft can be added or removed from the database as required.
Calculation modules within AIRPLAN AAR
automatically draw on data stored within the Receiver database. Program users should amend speed and fuel data
therein so that they are correct for whatever mission package is being planned (Note.
Receiver aircraft performance and characteristics data shown in screen shots of the Receiver Database, below, are
illustrative only and should not be taken as accurate).
Tanker Aircraft Database. Planners
enter and store required performance data for up to 18 different types of tanker. These
data can be amended as required. Calculation modules within
AIRPLAN AAR automatically draw on data
stored within the Tanker database for calculations in the six program modules. (Note.
Tanker aircraft performance and characteristics data shown in screen shots of the Tanker Database, below, are
illustrative only and should not be taken as accurate).
Tanker Capabilities Database. This contains data obtained by AIRPLAN from source documents in the public domain including from Allied Tactical Publication ATP56(A) and other Internet-based sources on tanker AR store fitments, fuel capacities, fuel flow rates and other data relating to US, NATO, Allied and other military and civil-operated tankers.
En Route Deployment AAR (i.e. the deployment of receiver aircraft over long distances
assisted by tankers using three different, alternative tanker support
techniques) The program
simultaneously calculates the number of tankers required when using each of
the three techniques. The output provides planners with
quantified data upon which to
base decisions as to which is the most suitable for the particular operational
situation.
Medium Range, Radius-of-Action AAR
(i.e. extending the radius of action and penetration depth of strike,
reconnaissance, ground attack, suppression of enemy air defences, tactical
transport and other operational roles requiring to attack or reconnoitre distant targets or
carry out long range air drops beyond the un-refuelled range of these aircraft).
AIRPLAN calculates the minimum number of tankers
required for the outward and homebound legs. It quantifies different tanker
employment options and consequences, and calculates fuel
requirements and timing.
AAR support to Combat Air Patrols (CAP) and other
Patrols (e.g. maritime patrol, AWACS, ELINT, etc.). AIRPLAN AAR Calculates the
number of tanker sorties required, the intervals at which tankers should be
relieved, sortie durations, the fuel masses transferred and
consumed by tankers and receivers, the maximum number or receivers supportable
by each tanker, the optimum AAR interval for refuelling receivers, etc.. Operational
requirements can be calculated for any required period (e.g. 2 days, 7 days,
28 days, etc.)
Very Long Range, Radius-of-Action AAR
(i.e. the air refuelling of receiver aircraft by tankers over oceans or
geographical areas where tankers cannot be based along the route [for
political, geographical or other reasons] and all tanker support has to come from one end of
the route [e.g. as in RAF AAR-supported operations from Ascension Island to
the Falkland Islands and return, non-stop, in 1982; and by certain USAF long-range, radius-of-action operations,
since then].
AIRPLAN AAR calculates the minimum number of tankers required
(including tankers to refuel tankers when necessary), the fuel mass transferred, the
timing of each tanker wave and the timing of receiver aircraft sorties to and
from the destination.
Air Bridge AAR (i.e. the long range
deployment of a stream or number of formations of aircraft, air refuelled in up to eight refuelling
areas en route). AIRPLAN AAR calculates tanker and fuel requirements, the minimum
recommended streaming interval between individual receiver aircraft or
formations, and many other
data. It provides an alternative and is supplementary to the En Route Deployment
AAR calculation module already described in the fourth bullet.
AAR support to Expeditionary Air Operations.
The program calculates three alternative methods of providing AR
support: [1] the air-to-air refuelling of forward
based tactical tankers by larger capacity tankers, [2] the air-to-air refuelling of forward-deployed,
FOB-based tactical aircraft or helicopters by loitering tankers, or [3] the
refuelling of temporary or permanent fuel farms at Forward Operating Bases (FOBs) or the refuelling
of aircraft on the ground at FOBs by tactical tankers able to operate from
a Forward Mounting Base (FMB) in the FOB.
The program calculates the
number of tankers required, the interval between sorties, the required tanker
and receiver sortie schedules [take-off time from base airfield, ETA Air
Refuelling Area, Off-Task time, and ETA Base] and the timing of each
refuelling as well as the mass of fuel transferred.
Block Speed Calculator. Assists
planners (whether using AIRPLAN AAR,
AIRPLAN MAOP or
AIRPLAN MFA) to calculate accurate sortie block speeds (from take-off to
landing) over medium or long distances taking into account speed
variations during up to eleven flight segments including: the initial climb,
up to six different cruise phases, two air-to-air refuelling segments, the
descent and final instrument approach and landing. Head wind and tail wind
vectors can be applied to increase the accuracy of calculated Block Speeds.
Fuel Burn Calculator. Automatically linked to the Block Speed calculator and designed to enable planners to calculate more accurate sortie fuel consumption and required air-to-air fuel transfer masses (when this is critical) for sorties consisting of up to eleven flight segments. Includes the ability, when calculating tanker fuel consumption and endurance, to take account of fuel masses transferred to receiver aircraft as well as fuel consumed by tankers' own engines.
Input and Results Data. In each of the program modules described against the 4th to 9th bullets, there are ‘Input Data’ pages and ‘Results’ (output data) pages. Having entered the data required into the Input data pages appropriate to the type of operation (n.b. the number of input data to be entered is the absolute minimum necessary to carry out required calculations), the user then selects the Results pages where full results (for receiver as well as for tanker aircraft) are instantly displayed. There is no 'running time' to wait for results. Importantly, whenever a planner is at all unsure about the exact accuracy of any data input, the user can vary the data, singly or in combination, to observe (immediately) whether such changes have a significant effect upon output data. Having obtained results using the AIRPLAN AAR program, the user can, if desired, next enter relevant data into either the AIRPLAN MAOP or MFA programs to calculate the minimum tanker or receiver fleet sizes and the minimum number of aircrews required to sustain continuous operations for any defined period (for example, for 3 days, or for 4 weeks).
Input & Output Display Screens of the AIRPLAN Air Refuelling Planning_v3 Program
Title Page
(Please scroll down the page to view all the Air Refuelling Planning_v3 displays)The program is written in Microsoft Excel. The opening Title page is seen below. There is a button to select the Main Menu. It also displays the military organisation or commercial company to whom the program is licensed (not shown in the example). It also states the Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights of the owner of all AIRPLAN programs.

Main Menu
The Main Menu page shows the arrangement of the AIRPLAN AAR application and enables the user to access each of the six main AAR program modules (contained within menu boxes), two additional calculation modules (Block Speed and Fuel Burn) and three databases (Receiver, Tanker and Tanker Capabilities). A further button at the foot of the page will return you to the Title page (Close Program). Note that the Receiver Database button is Red, and the Tanker and Tanker Capabilities databases are Green. These follow colour coding rules explained below.

Colour Coding
Wherever possible, colour-coding for
Receiver and Tanker aircraft is repeated throughout the program to distinguish the two roles: Red for Receivers and Green for Tankers. This is helpful, especially when an airplane type is common to both the Receiver and Tanker roles. It also provides a useful reminder when entering data into Input tables, especially when amending entries in the Tanker and Receiver databases.Cells with a White background are usually (but not in every case) the only cells into which data can and should be entered. Cells with a Yellow background usually contain output (results) data calculated by AIRPLAN AAR.
Blue text or cell backgrounds refer to data common to both Tankers and Receivers.Tanker Database

The above Tanker Database has the facility to store data for 18 Tanker types, chosen and entered by the user. The user is required to enter only such data as are necessary for AIRPLAN AAR
to carry out its calculations. Other parts of the program automatically access the databases to obtain inputs for all calculations. The user can add to, delete or amend data in the database table at any time. Before planning a new operation the user should check that data already in the database are relevant to the particular scenario being planned and evaluated (e.g. True Air Speed at cruise, fuel burn, reserves.). Note that table headings and tanker aircraft types are colour-coded ‘Green’.IMPORTANT NOTE. All sample data shown in the above example of the Tanker Database are illustrative, only. They are not necessarily correct and serve only to demonstrate the content and function of the AIRPLAN AAR program.
Tanker Capabilities Database

This database contains data not included in the Tanker Database, such as the type and number of air refuelling stores fitted (e.g. boom, hose, etc), refuelling altitude bands and speeds cleared for air refuelling, typical fuel off-loads and fuel transfer rates of individual AR stores fitted, and primary fuel types that are cleared for the tanker. Data contained in this database table are mostly extracted from Allied Tactical Publication, ATP 56A. Tankers are listed by nation, beginning with the USA, followed by the UK, then by other NATO nations with tanker forces, other non-NATO nations around the world and finally, civilian-run tanker organisations.
Receiver Aircraft Database

The Receiver Aircraft Database has the facility to store data on 18 different types of receiver aircraft. The table contains only those performance data essential to enable
AIRPLAN AAR to complete its calculations. The program user chooses the aircraft types and enters the data, and can delete or amend them at any time. Headings and receiver aircraft types are colour-coded ‘Red’. It is essential for AIRPLAN AAR users to ensure that data entered into the database are relevant to the particular operation being evaluated or planned. Such items as Climb and Cruise TAS or Block Speed, fuel carried, etc. must be relevant to the particular sortie / mission because the program will automatically draw on data from the Receiver database unless it is separately called for on the mission input data page.IMPORTANT NOTE. All sample data shown in the above example of the Receiver Aircraft Database are illustrative, only. They are not necessarily accurate and serve only to demonstrate the content and function of the AIRPLAN AAR program.
En Route Deployment AAR Input Data

In long range deployment operations, receiver aircraft have to transit from one base to another over a distance beyond their prudent un-refuelled range (the aircraft's maximum prudent range, allowing reserves for diversion, etc. is shown in the yellow cell at the top of the page). It has automatically been extracted by AIRPLAN AAR from the Receiver Database. AIRPLAN calculations make provision for three alternative ways in which AAR support might be given to receivers on this type of operation, plus a further variation requiring a Yes/No answer, three cells from the bottom of the page. AIRPLAN AAR automatically calculates the number of tankers and fuel required for each of these options. The planner then has sufficient quantitative information upon which to decide the most appropriate employment option. The planner first selects or enters the required input data for receiver and tanker aircraft and enters mission data into cells with a white background. Note that where the background colour of a cell is Yellow the AIRPLAN AAR program has automatically calculated the contents so as to reduce data entry time and effort. This applies, also, for example, to the 'Receiver A/c un-refuelled range', ‘Calculated Minimum No. of AAR transfers essential’ and the ‘Calculated Final Leg Distance’ cells.
If the range of the receiver a/c is too short to permit fuel transfers only in the vicinity of AARAs close to the intermediate tanker bases (and therefore requiring fuel transfers at shorter intervals in a moving ALTRV), the AIRPLAN program will automatically display a warning to the planner.. If a warning does not appear, the program will automatically calculate and indicate to the user whether the RV AAR method is more economical than either of the other options. Finally, you will see in several places on this page (and on most subsequent pages) small, red 'tick marks' in the corner of some cells or against some headings. By placing the mouse pointer over such tick marks, a Note will appear giving advice on completing the table or the correct interpretation of inputs or results. In general, however, the correct way to complete Input tables is self-evident.
En Route AAR Deployment Results Page 1

All output data shown on Results page 1 are displayed as soon as the last required input data item has been entered. The example shows results for three different methods of employing tanker support to the deploying receiver aircraft. At the top of the left-hand column are the type of tanker employed, the type and number of receivers being supported, and the mass of fuel they will consume. The first of the three techniques automatically examined by the AAR program in this module is shown next in this column. This is where tankers take-off from the departure base and accompany receiver aircraft all the way to the destination. The number of tankers required and the calculated fuel mass they can transfer using this technique, are shown. In the example case, only 1 tanker is the minimum required. In the second left-hand section, it is assumed that a number of tankers will accompany receivers to the next intermediate Air-to-Air Refuelling Area (AARA) and because 'Yes' was entered 3 cells up from the bottom on the data entry page, tankers will then have to return to their departure base (without refuelling) to land (rather than landing at the next intermediate en route tanker staging airbase). At the first intermediate AARA, a relief tanker (that will have taken off from the first en route intermediate air base), will take over AAR support to the receivers and stay with them until the second AARA, then returning to the airfield from which it took off. In the example case, where there is a necessity for two en route AARAs and tanker staging bases, another relief tanker will assume responsibility from the second tanker at the second AARA. It will refuel the receivers and stay with them until the AR / AAR End Point (see data entry in the 4th cell from the bottom of the data entry page, 250 nm from the destination in the example case). The second relief tanker will then return to the airfield from which it took off. If "No" had been entered into the 3rd cell from the bottom left-hand column of the data entry page, the second relief tanker would accompany the receivers to and land at the far destination airfield. The total number of tankers required for technique No. 2 is two (compared with one if a tanker accompanies receivers all the way).
On the right-hand side of the Results 1 page,
AIRPLAN AAR has also calculated that it would be possible for the receivers to reach the first AARA un-refuelled, and if met and air-refuelled by a rendezvous tanker (that had taken off from the first en route tanker base), fully refuelled receivers would then have sufficient fuel to reach the second AARA where they could be met and refuelled by a second RV tanker. This could if necessary accompany them to the AR End Point (250 nm from the destination) and return to the second en route tanker base. In summary, the program has calculated that whereas deployment Method 1) would require 1 tanker to accompany the 4 receivers, Methods 2) and 3) would require two (operating from different bases en route, as indicated). Of course, Method 1 is by no means always the most economical technique to use (especially if their fuel capacity is much lower than the KC-10 Extender); it may also be operationally inconvenient to have to deploy a tanker (or tankers) to the far destination. In any scenario, therefore, AIRPLAN AAR will calculate and present to the planner, the numbers of tankers and mass of fuel consumed (which relates to operation cost) for all of the three / four techniques examined in this calculation module. These can be vastly different depending upon the scenario and cannot be guessed at. Given the results, planners can then confidently decide which makes the best sense. It should be noted that the program automatically calculates how much fuel receivers require at the last fuel transfer in order to land at their destination airfield with the reserve fuel mass designated in the Receiver Database. If, therefore, a planner wishes receivers to arrive with a greater mass of fuel than normal (for holding, for example), the planner must simply amend the Receiver Database to show the greater mass of reserve fuel required.En Route Deployment Results Page 2

Results page 2 provides the planner or analyst with a deeper analysis of the number of tankers required for each alternative tanker employment option and the efficiency of the operation when using the selected tanker type. This table can be especially useful for tanker aircraft manufacturers and aircraft procurement organisations in Ministries or Departments of Defense. The Table includes such data as the percentages and quantities of fuel transferred by each tanker at each RV, their predicted fuel states on landing, etc. This enables the merits of different tanker types and employment options to be examined more closely. It also includes calculation of the expected fuel-state of receiver aircraft on landing at the destination.
Medium Range Radius-of-Action Missions to Targets

In medium range radius-of-action AAR supported missions, tankers are used typically to extend the radius-of-action of combat aircraft or tactical transports (fixed or rotary wing). To assist the program user, a (non dynamic) diagram at the foot of the screen illustrates a typical scenario. Tankers can but need not be co-located with receivers at the same base and the AIRPLAN AAR program allows for this. Assuming they are not co-located (as in the example above) receiver aircraft will RV with tankers at a designated air-to-air refuelling area (AARA). The geographical location of the AARA will depend on the un-refuelled range of the receiver A/c, and the proximity of enemy territory and defences. The AIRPLAN program does not dictate where the AARA should be positioned as this can be influenced by many factors. Instead, it takes the situation it is presented with and calculates how many tankers will be required for the outbound AAR, whether these tankers will have enough fuel to loiter and later re-fuel the receivers on their inbound leg; and if not, it automatically calculates how many tankers will be required to meet receiver aircraft on their return leg, and when they should take-off. The planner simply enters the receiver and tanker data indicated on the Input data page and the AIRPLAN program instantly calculates all the required output data, automatically. The program will warn the planner if the radius from AARA 1 via the designated targets or DZs and returning to AARA 2 is beyond the RoA of receiver aircraft filled with fuel at AARA 1.
It should be noted that at AARA 2, the program requires that Tanker(s) will only transfer sufficient fuel to the receivers (on the inbound leg) to ensure they can reach their base with their mandatory destination reserve fuel. It is up to the planner to decide how much fuel to state as the mandatory reserve and to enter that mass into the Receiver Database. However, it will be seen on the Results page (below) that AIRPLAN users are given detailed information on the amount of spare give-away fuel in each tanker after transfers at AARA 2, enabling planners (if need be) to increase the receivers' mandatory reserve fuel requirement to ensure that they are not unnecessarily short of fuel on return to base.
Medium Range Radius-of-Action Missions – Results Page

The
AIRPLAN AAR-calculated Results for medium range, radius-of-action (RoA) missions are shown above. Line 1 indicates the number of tankers required at the outbound refuelling bracket. The second line shows the calculated number of tankers required to refuel receiver aircraft on the return leg to base. It also indicates whether it would be feasible for tankers that refuelled aircraft on the outbound leg, to loiter and refuel the same aircraft inbound, or whether fresh tankers would have to be deployed for the recovery (not necessary in the above example). The wording of Line 2 automatically changes to indicate the number of fresh tankers that would have to deploy to AARA 2 if the first wave of tankers would have insufficient fuel to complete both the outbound and inbound refuelling. The remainder of the table provides data on fuel usage, reserves and mission times for tanker (Green) and receiver aircraft (Red).AAR of CAP and other Patrol Missions – Input Data 1

This AIRPLAN AAR module calculates AR requirements for Combat Air Patrols and any and all other types of patrol operation (e.g. VP or maritime patrol, AEW/AEW & C, Elint / Comint, EW and tankers supporting other loitering tankers). The user enters data for each Combat Air Patrol (CAP) or other type of patrol. The green numbers in cells near the top on the page will have been calculated by the AIRPLAN program by the time the user has to enter the number of Receiver A/c at each Patrol radius. This will prevent the planner over-tasking a tanker. Other data entries are straightforward. At the foot of the page there is a diagram illustrating a typical patrol scenario.
AAR Support of Receiver A/c on CAP or other Patrol - CAP Input Data page 2

The purpose of the second data input page is for AIRPLAN to calculate the maximum number of patrolling receivers that can be AR-supported by each tanker associated with a particular CAP or other patrol area at a particular radius from base. The program also calculates the optimum interval (in hours and minutes) between consecutive AR transfers for each receiver, in order to maximize the efficiency of receiver a/c patrol coverage (minimizing transit time between the CAP station and the tanker). In addition, this module calculates the maximum number of receiver a/c each tanker could handle if receivers were to air refuel from them at 1) the calculated optimum interval, or 2), at hourly intervals. It should be noted that Input Data Page 2 (below) relates to and calculates only one patrol radius at a time. The user enters whichever patrol area is to be calculated, into the first cell on the page ("CAP Number") . In the example, data have been entered for CAP / Patrol Radius 1.
AAR for CAP and Other Patrols – Results Page 1

The table above shows the first set of calculated results for CAP patrols. In the example, CAPs are being supported simultaneously at three different radii. Tankers are tasked loiter in AARAs associated with the CAP they are tasked to support, all at approximately the same radius from the receiver aircraft base. The AAR program has calculated the average length of time for which each tanker will have enough fuel to transfer to fighters on CAP, and therefore the interval at which tankers will have to be relieved. NOTE: These data can then be entered into the AIRPLAN MAOP program to determine the size and composition (aircraft and crews) of the tanker fleet required to support and sustain the operation over the selected period (in this case 7 days). Other output data include fuel masses, sorties and flight hours, etc. In such operations, where patrol cover is to be maintained continuously over periods of several days or even weeks, it is vital to calculate, accurately (using AIRPLAN MAOP or MFA), the numbers of aircraft and crews and the quantity of fuel required. It is also important to include an estimation of likely flying rates immediately prior to and following the operation so that AIRPLAN can include this in calculations to determine the total number of crews required over a full 28-day period. This is where AIRPLAN MAOP and MFA, in addition to AIRPLAN AAR, are invaluable to planners.
AAR for CAP and Other Patrols – Results Page 2

Among other output data, Results page 2 provides a detailed breakdown of the maximum number of receivers that can be given effective AR support by the number of tankers and tanker sorties tasked for the operation. These data are output from the Patrols Input Data page 2 and therefore refer only to the Patrol Radius currently selected on the Input page 2. Hence, if Patrol radius 1 is selected on CAP AAR Input page 2 (as in the case of this example), the output data on page CAP Results 2 will be for CAP 1 only. A Blue coloured message towards the top right side of the page reminds the planner to which patrol radius the data are relevant
Very Long Range AAR – Input Data Page

The screen shot above shows the Input Data page for 'Very Long-Range, Radius-of-Action' AAR missions. A diagram near the bottom of the screen shows a typical scenario for such an operation. Tanker aircraft refuel receivers both outbound and inbound. "Very long-range" is assumed typically to be a radius of action of 2,000 to 4,000 nautical miles.
The ‘Bracket’ points (B1, B2, B3 and B4) are locations at which a particular tanker or tankers, directly supporting a receiver or receivers, is/are relieved by another or other tankers. In very-long range operations, tankers may well have to refuel other tankers to enable them to reach one of the refuelling brackets with sufficient fuel to transfer adequate fuel to the receivers they are supporting, without themselves running short of fuel (e.g. between B1 and B2). AIRPLAN AAR automatically calculates and includes in the overall total, the numbers of tankers to achieve such a tanker relay and recovery operation, safely.
At B2 (or whichever is the last outbound Bracket number), the direct support tanker fills up the receiver or receivers and they proceed to the target (or drop zone) and then return to be refuelled by a fresh tanker or tankers at B3 (or whichever is the first inbound Bracket number).
AIRPLAN AAR allows a planner to stipulate the lowest percentage fuel tank contents level to which a receiver aircraft will be allowed to fall before being refuelled.
The program can also calculate the timing of the whole operation to enable receiver aircraft to meet a stipulated time on target at the farthest point. It also automatically warns the planner should any input data result in an unachievable mission.
Very Long Range Radius-of-Action AAR – Results Page

The Results page for very long range (VLR) AAR operations is shown above. Without AIRPLAN AAR, it is very time-consuming to determine whether such an operation is feasible and at what cost in terms of tanker employment. AIRPLAN AAR program enables one person to complete the initial calculation and planning process within a few minutes. The Results page includes all necessary output data on the number of tanker refuelling brackets, the number of tankers per bracket, the distance and flight times between brackets, and the number of hook-ups required. It also calculates the number of tankers required per wave, the mass of fuel transferred to receivers, the tanker and receiver reserves on return to base, and other useful data. In addition, it calculates the dates and times of departure and arrival of receivers and tankers based on the receiver’s required date and time of arrival on target.
AIRPLAN Air Bridge AAR - Input Data

The Air Bridge AAR Support module calculates comprehensive output data for up to six air-to-air refuelling areas (AARA) and air refuelling control points (ARCP) spaced along the length of an air bridge route. As for all other Air Refuelling Planning input data worksheets, the first action should be to up-date data within the Tanker and Receiver aircraft Databases to ensure that all data therein are relevant to the planned operation. Next, begin to input all the tanker and receiver data required. Most data requirements are self-evident. In the fifth cell to be completed, the number of aircraft per wave of formation is the number of receiver aircraft per group or wave that will fly together, in formation. There could, for example, be four waves or groups of aircraft with two aircraft in each group, a total of eight aircraft. The program assumes that each of these waves will be refuelled as a group. A tanker might refuel two a/c and then the other two. Alternatively, aircraft would be refuelled individually if receivers were supported by a boom equipped tanker.
The number of ARCPs you have entered in the 10th input cell will dictate the number of ARCPs and the other titles in the receiver and tanker aircraft Table in the lower half of the data input page. For example, if (as in the example) 4 is the number of ARCPs entered in the 10th cell on the data input page, ARCPs 1 to 4 will automatically appear as titles above the first 5 columns of the table. The heading after the last (in this case 4th) ARCP will in this case be (route) Segment 5, followed by the Instrument Approach leg (Inst App) and landing. To decide the number or ARCPs, the planner must take into consideration the prudent un-refuelled range of the aircraft and the distance to an alternate diversion airfield to cater for the situation whereby there is a receiver a/c fails (for any reason) to receive fuel or sufficient fuel from the tanker at an ARCP. This information is automatically provided to the user from the receiver database.
Note that, in the example, the planner has decided to add a further 3-minute margin to the recommended minimum separation between Receiver a/c waves, calculated by AIRPLAN and displayed on the Air Bridge Results 1 page (see next screen shot).
Note that the third (and sixth) lines of the table allow you to enter tailwind (+) and headwind (-) components along the route track. If you do not wish to enter any wind components, enter zeros. Especially if a headwind is forecast or normally expected along the deployment route, it is prudent to enter this for each route segment in the cells provided. The AIRPLAN AAR program will automatically calculate the effect that the wind component entered will have upon the flight time of each route segment and the mass of fuel consumed by the receiver (this is displayed on the Results 2 page).
Air Bridge Results 1 - Tanker Output Data

Air Bridge Results 1 page contains all relevant output information on Tankers engaged in the operation. As stated above, it includes the recommended minimum interval between groups of receivers. No further explanation of the above results is really necessary. Note, however, that on this page the AIRPLAN program has already calculated and is advising the program user the minimum interval that should be planned between waves (individual or formations) of receiver aircraft. This is to ensure that the air refuelling of one wave should have been completed, and the tanker will have had sufficient time to reposition at the ARCP before the arrival of the succeeding wave or formation of receivers. It is also the interval that will ensure that all receivers pass down the air bridge route in the shortest possible elapsed time since the take-off of the first wave.
Air Bridge Results 2 - Receiver A/c Output Data

Air Bridge Results 2 output data for Receiver a/c is self-explanatory. The page contains comprehensive information concerning receiver a/c performance and operations during an Air Bridge operation.
Note: the latest version of the Air Bridge sub program allows planners to stipulate the landing fuel of receiver aircraft at the destination airfield. This dictates the mass of fuel air-transferred by tankers at the last ARCP. The landing fuel stipulated can be greater than the minimum mandatory fuel reserve entered by the planner in the Receiver Database. This facility is not included in the En-Route Deployment sub program which automatically calculates the mass of fuel to be transferred at the last ARCP that will enable receiver a/c to land with the mandatory destination reserve fuel mass entered in the Receiver Database. This difference between the two sub-programs can be seen from differences in the mass of fuel transferred by tankers at the last ARCP, as well as in the total fuel air-transferred by tankers.
Expeditionary Force Operations - Description of Scenarios

Expeditionary Force Operation Scenario Overview. A separate display page illustrates the three Scenarios that the Airplan AAR program simultaneously calculates. Broadly, the operational concept could be defensive where (for example) the planner decides to deploy forces into or close to foreign territory in order to rescue national civilian or military personnel whose safety is under threat in another country. Airplan enables you to plan rescue missions, aided by tanker aircraft, to up to eight different locations, simultaneously. Alternatively, Airplan enables planners to plan offensive and/ or (for example) airlift or reconnaissance operations, to up to eight different DZs (DVs) or targets, or along up to eight different routes, simultaneously.
Expeditionary Force Operations - Receiver A/c Input Data

This page caters for up to eight separate routes to targets, dropping zones and forward landing strips or helicopter landing sites. Use this page to input all the receiver a/c input data required regardless of which of the three scenarios is the one you intend to adopt. If any adjustment of input data is required should you decide to opt to carry out missions in accordance with Scenario 2 as compared with Scenarios 1 and 3 - which have major similarities - a Warning message will make you aware if such adjustments are necessary.
Note that there are red ‘ticks’ in the top right corner of cells containing the description of input data required. By placing the mouse over these ticks you will be able to read helpful guidance on data inputs.
Finally, note that in the top right corner of the page is a key entitled “Calculate Expeditionary Operations”. If you have already inserted the Tanker Input Data for expeditionary Operations (see below), select this key and the operation timing schedule will be calculated. If you have not yet input Tanker data, the user should not press this key but the similar one on the Tanker Input data page (there are also comprehensive User Guides for all AIRPLAN programs).
Expeditionary Force Operations - Tanker Input Data

This is the only page on which to enter tanker aircraft input data for engagement in Scenarios 1, 2 and/or 3 of Expeditionary Operations. As on the previous page, the Tanker input data page has many red ‘ticks’ that you can place the mouse over in order to receive more detailed guidance and tips on entering data.
Expeditionary Force Operations - Scenario 1 - Tanker Results

Scenario 1 Tanker results are self-explanatory. They include data for the Main Tanker(s) that transport fuel from a rear mounting base to the Forward Operating Base (FOB) AARA where fuel is transferred to a succession of Tactical Air/Ground Tankers (sibling tankers) that take fuel from the Main tanker, return to the FOB and either transfer it directly to tactical f/w aircraft or helicopters or into bowsers or temporary / permanent fuel farm storage (it being assumed that there is insufficient fuel available at the FOB for use by a/c that have deployed there).
Expeditionary Force Operations - Scenarios 1 - Receiver Results (same results as for Scenario 3)

Expeditionary Force Operations - Scenario 1 - Table 1 - FOB Ground Refuelling Schedule

Table 1 vertically lists a series of mission route letter (A-H) and refuelling serial numbers of receiver aircraft (e.g. B1, G1, etc). The order in which these are arranged in the table will be the chronological order in which these missions arrive at the FOB for refuelling. The times at which they are predicted to arrive are listed to the right, in Col (3). The user is reminded that AIRPLAN AAR Expeditionary Ops program assumes that aircraft need to complete as many mission as they can in the shortest possible time (e.g. to deploy troops or rescue civilians) and aircraft are therefore not refuelled at the FOB until they have too little fuel to complete a further sortie and return to the FOB again, with not less than their stipulated minimum fuel reserve. Col (4) shows the mass of fuel to be given to each mission (N.B. If there is more than one a/c in a mission, the amount of fuel shown will be the total required by all a/c comprising the mission) . Col (5) shows the progressive cumulative mass of fuel required for refuelling at the FOB. In Col (6) is shown the serial number of Main Tanker sorties able to meet the cumulative fuel demand. Hence, when the number in Col (6) increases from 1 to 2 (et sec) this indicates the the 1st tanker sortie cannot fully meet the fuel mass needs of the next receiver mission in sequence, and the required fuel will therefore have to be be delivered by Main Tanker sortie number 2. Col (7) shows the time by which Tanker sortie Number 2 will have to land at the FOB. This time is entered by the user on the Tanker Input data page and is normally is normally about 15 to 45 minutes before the deadline, to allow time for de-fuelling arrangements to be set up. It is also assumed in Scenario 1 that each Main tanker will remain on the ground at the FOB until its last scheduled de-fuelling has been completed.
Expeditionary Force Operations - Scenario 1 - Table 2 - Main Tanker & FOB-based Refuelling Schedules

Table 2 shows, on the left the Main Tanker sortie time schedule. Col (1) lists the last Air-Ground Tanker sortie that each Main tanker is able fully to refuel. If a Main tanker cannot transfer the full load required, it will be relieved by the next Main tanker sortie before fuel transfer takes place. Hence, if (for example) the first Main tanker sortie is able fully to refuel two Air-Ground tanker sorties, the number 2 will appear in Col (1) against the first Main tanker sortie. Cols (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) in the left-hand table show the sortie timing on each Main tanker sortie, including the required or predicted time of its last AAR transfer before hand-over to its relieving tanker, the take-off time, pre-position (in the ARAA) time, first planned AR Contact Time, and the ETA Base on completion of each sortie. The right–hand table (Col (7) shows the Air-Ground tanker (Gtanker) sortie number (T1, T2, T3, etc) followed in Cols (8), (9), (10) and (11) by the time at which the Ground Tanker connects to the Main tanker for its AR transfer, the time by which it is assumed the Ground tanker will have unloaded all its fuel (which is also assumed to be the time at which it will take-ff on its next sortie if one is required), the amount of fuel transferred to it by the Main tanker per sortie, and in Col (11) the cumulative mass of fuel so far transferred to the FOB by Main tankers via the air refuelled Air-Ground tankers.
Expeditionary Force Operations - Scenario 2 - Tanker Results Data

The results data calculated by AIRPLAN AAR, above, are self-evident.
Expeditionary Force Operations - Scenario 2 - Table 1 - Refuelling Mass & Sortie Time Schedule

Table 1 shows the chronological order and timing, and the fuel mass transfers from Main tankers to receivers within the ARAA located near the FOB. It shows the order in which a/c on routes A to H (or however many of these routes have been tasked) will refuel and the mass transferred to each a/c or formation. A1 indicates the first AAR for the aircraft (or formation of a/c) flying route A. C3 is the third AAR by a/c flying route C; and so on. The table also shows the sortie serial number of the tanker delivering the fuel at each transfer, the total amount of fuel transferred or itself burned by each tanker, and the elapsed time on task of each tanker sortie.
Expeditionary Force Operations - Scenario 2 - Table 2 - Main Tanker Sortie Schedule

Table 2 shows the AIRPLAN -calculated sortie schedules for each Main tanker, including take-off, on task, off task, elapsed patrol time and ETA at the Forward Mounting Base (or the tankers’ main operating base).
Expeditionary Force Operations - Scenario 3 - Main Tanker Results

The above Tanker results data are self-explanatory.
Expeditionary Force Operations - Scenario 3 - Table 1 - Tanker Sortie & Fuel Delivery Schedule

Table 1 shows the Main tanker sortie and fuel delivery schedule calculated by AIRPLAN AAR between the FMB and the FOB. In blue is shown the amount of fuel that will have to be delivered to the FOB before the operation starts (this has been derived from the fuel state of receiver a/c at the FOB, entered by the user / planner on the penultimate line of the Receiver a/c Input Data page. The Table also shows the latest time by which the Main tanker must land at the FOB in order not to delay the FOB-based a/c sortie schedule.
Expeditionary Force Operations - Scenario 3 - Table 2 -Ground Refuelling of FOB-based A/c by Tankers Delivering Fuel from a Forward Mounting Base

Table 2 shows the ground refuelling schedule of FOB-based aircraft. As for Scenario 1, the program assumes that a/c operating from the FOB will only refuel when their fuel states are such that they would be unable to carry out a further sortie and remain above their minimum fuel reserve on return to the FOB. The objective is to carry out as many missions in the shortest time. Table 2 also shows the time by which tankers (able to land at the FOB) operating from the Forward Mounting Base must arrive at the FOB to begin their fuel delivery. It shows which Main tanker sorties will meet the fuel requirements of which missions by FOB-based a/c (e.g. B1, C1, A1 etc). Main tankers in the case of Scenario 3 are likely to be relatively high capacity tankers with a tactical field performance such as the C-130J tanker and, in the future, the tanker variant of the Airbus A400M.
Calculation of Block Speed, Flight Segment & Sortie Times

The Block Speed Calculator was introduced with effect from Version 3.6 of AIRPLAN AAR. This enables AIRPLAN users to calculate with much greater ease and accuracy, the mean block speed (i.e. the mean speed in knots, averaged from the take-off time to the first landing time) on different types of AAR or non AAR missions. This will facilitate the more accurate calculation of flight segment and sortie fuel consumptions, and overall sortie times.
The Block Speed Calculator includes the facility to enter headwind or tailwind (or no wind) components to: 1) the take-off and climb to cruising altitude segment, 2) the descent from cruising altitude to the start of an Instrument Approach, and 3) the Instrument Approach and Landing – all as separate flight segments. Each of these, plus each of up to 6 Level Cruise flight segments, and two AAR Transfer segments (which can be one, or the sum of several AAR transfers according to need), can all be entered and have wind components applied
.Fuel Burn Calculations - Linked to the Block Speed Calculator

As from AIRPLAN AAR Version 3.6, a Fuel Burn calculation table is included in Air Refuelling Planning_v3.xls. This is linked to and receives many of its input data from the Block Speed Calculator Table in the same spreadsheet. Its format is compatible with the Block Speed calculator and has the same degree of versatility. It allows the AIRPLAN user to make additional use of valuable output data derived by the Block Speed calculator to determine more accurate tanker and / or receiver fleet fuel consumption figures. These can then be cross-checked with those derived (for example) by the CAP AAR program; input data on other pages can also be refined using outputs from the Block Speed and Fuel Burn calculators.
Help
Many pages and cells throughout the AIRPLAN AAR program have Help facilities. These can easily be accessed by users, by pointing the mouse, to remind them how to enter or interpret data correctly.
Conclusion
E-MAIL:
airplan@military-airplanner.comDerek K. Empson - Owner and Developer of AIRPLAN Military-Airplanner, Airlift & Air Refueling Planning programs