|
Most Environmental Design students, and some others, understand about Wurster Hall. Its design and construction were greeted with considerable verbiage on the part of the committee that created it: The solution [to the design problem] lay not in adherence to any single ideology or dogma, but rather in finding a reasonable path among a great array of conflicting and competing requirements...giving the greatest importance to conflicting requirements and...finding a way so that the status of each requirement and its conflicts was preserved.... We sought not to resolve conflict but to preserve it. [The building was designed to] raise questions more than offer answers. Well, I have a few questions. What function are those sheet metal brackets in the corners of each stairwell landing supposed to fulfill? Why would anyone bother to tile miniscule portions of the walls and ceilings in the stairwell? What's behind that wooden wall at the very bottom of the stairs? Why are there two doors into the stairs on the first floor? Can you really park a locomotive on the concrete sunshades? And why don't they block the sun? Where was the brain of the person who installed clear plumbing pipes in the classroom ceilings? And, finally, the most important question of all-why is the courtyard on the second floor always locked? This courtyard contains two planters and two statues--one a copy of the Venus de Milo and the other a modern version of an ancient goddess. Is it, perhaps, sacred to Aphrodite, opened only on holy days for ceremonies performed by white-robed virgins? We begin our tour of the "College of the Environmentally Deranged" by taking the elevator to the ninth floor, which is as high as it goes. The elevator used to have graffiti-friendly walls; after a stint with vertical carpet, it is now paneled in the same thing "white chalkboards" are made of. The first stop would have been the top balcony, with its stunning view of the Campanile--now, though, the doorknob is disabled. Fortunately, we can still go out onto the ninth floor balcony--the view is almost as good, but in one direction rather than three. It's still worthwhile to hike up to the 10 1/2th floor, past the former "Office of Pygmy Studies" to where the stairs end. Here is an ideal place for murals--currently on exhibit are three black and white squares depicting a hand with a gun, a family turkey dinner, and two children walking down a road. We proceed downstairs at a leisurely pace, observing the highlights of 27 years of student creativity. In this ever-changing landscape there currently seem to be fewer set pieces of "art," like the "evil" Tree of Life on the 9th floor (formerly one of two--the "good" Tree has unfortunately vanished) or even the thermonuclear dancing pig on the seventh floor landing, and more illegible spray painted scrawl, alas. The slogans, in Chinese and German as well as English, range from the allegedly profound ("give love--get love--love!") and the mildly amusing ("the BART police are tapping my phone") to the downright obscure ("they said I was a fish/they dipped me into flour/and I became a dish/but I was not sweet and sour") and completely rational ("Why are architecture students in such a badly designed building?? So they won't copy"). On the whole, Wursterites seem to ponder politics, police brutality, aesthetics and art, as well as the usual University concerns ("roast the Regents on a spit"). You may detour on the fifth floor to inspect the pillar where an Arch 1A student christened the building in 1964. The stairs branch off here, where we can observe a technical tour de force, the imposition of a 10'x10' 3-D map of a planned city onto the wall. Someone recently added a wonderful "CAL" stencil to this masterpiece. The city is near a two-story elegantly rendered man, also worth a look. Farther down from this is mostly more of the same, though the hedgehog doorstop, the flowers at each stair from the second to the first floor, and the "cactus girls" are notable. At the very bottom, under the stairs, was a manifesto that has been there at least a decade, as a memorial to freshman angst; it has recently been made into a black wall. It is said that Berkeley is an anonymous, repressive, bureaucratic environment Wurster seems to be the one place where individual students feel allowed to break out. BibliographyMost of what is in this book I have seen, heard, experienced or read about in the Daily Cal. Aside from the usual guides to and histories of the city and campus, I recommend the following to those interested in the buildings, personalities and traditions of the University: Campus Planning Study Group. Campus Historic Resources Survey. Berkeley, 1978. Everything you could possibly want to know about every piece of architecture on campus. If you hoped this book would have detailed discussions about loggias, colonnades and porticoes, get rid of it and find this one. Charbonneau, Bob, et al. Strawberry Creek--A Walking Tour of Campus Natural History. Berkeley, 1990. More information than I've given on the natural resources of the campus site. International Competition for the Phoebe Hearst Architectural Plan for the University of California. San Francisco, 1899(?). See for yourself what our campus could have looked like. Paltridge, James Gilbert. A History of the Faculty Club at Berkeley. Faculty Club, University of California, Berkeley, 1990. A labor of love by a distinguished alumnus. Available at the Men's Faculty Club. Partridge, Loren W. John Galen Howard and the Berkeley Campus: Beaux-ArtsArchitecture in the Athens of the West. Berkeley, 1978. A brief biography and career history as well as an in-depth study of Howard's ideas and University work. Sibley, Robert and Carol. University of California Pilgrimage. 1952. A hilarious compendium of campus traditions and anecdotes by people who were there in the beginning and knew such people as Phoebe Hearst and Benjamin Ide Wheeler. Stadtman, Verne A., ed. Centennial Record of the University of California. Berkeley, 1967. An encyclopedia of information about all nine campuses. The copy in the Bancroft Library contains handwritten corrections and updates. University of California at Berkeley, Long Range Development Plan, 1989-2005. Berkeley, 1989. They talk the talk, but do they walk the walk? Check this out and make the Regents toe the line.
|
Introduction | Part I: History and Development | Part II: The Existing Campus | Part III: Resources | Epilog