Komet Me 163 A Fighter Ahead of Its Time In July of 1944, American airmen over Germany found themselves being attacked by something that looked more like a football with swept wings than a fighter aircraft. It moved faster than anything they had ever seen, and climbed at what appeared to be an impossibly steep angle. Their assailant was the Messerschmitt Me 163B Komet.
Aerodynamically, the Me 163 was the culmination of a long line of experiments with tailless airplanes conducted by Alexander Lippisch, starting with the 1927 Storch 1 glider. By all accounts, its basic flying qualities were excellent. It was stable in all axes, and pilots praised its maneuverability and handling. The airplane had a swept-back wing and no horizontal tail. A pair of fabric-covered elevons on the outer portions of the wings controlled both pitch and roll. The primary reason for the wing sweep was to improve the pitch moment arm of the elevons rather than to increase the critical Mach number of the airplane. In fact, the 23.3-degree quarter-chord sweep was probably enough to improve the high-speed characteristics of the airplane a little. A flap system was required because of the very low drag of the basic Komet airframe. The airplane was very clean aerodynamically, giving it a flat glide angle. This made it very difficult for a pilot to hit a precise touchdown point. The Komet also had a tendency to float in ground effect. If it was brought in a little too fast, it simply didn’t want to stop flying. Adding a landing flap and/or aerodynamic drag brake to the airplane steepens the glide, making it easier for the pilot to hit his landing spot precisely. Putting flaps on the Komet was not simple. The small moment arm of the elevons made the use of conventional flaps impossible. The elevons were not powerful enough to trim out the nose-down pitching moment generated by flaps. The solution was to place landing flaps under the inboard half of the wings, with the hinge line well forward of the trailing edge. These could be deflected without affecting pitching moment. The craft also carried inboard, trailing-edge trim flaps. While several of the faster piston-engine fighters of the time had encountered difficulties due to compressibility effects, the Komet was the first fighter to charge headlong into the world of transonic flight. As air flows over an object, it changes speed. In near the nose, the air is slowed. Further aft, where the air is accelerated, the local airspeed is actually higher than the speed of the airplane. As the speed of the airplane approaches the speed of sound, the local flow will go supersonic on some parts of the airplane. The “critical Mach number” of the airplane is the flight Mach number at which the local flow first goes supersonic on the wing. When flying above the critical Mach number but below the speed of sound, the airplane is in the “transonic” flight regime. The airspeed is less than Mach 1, but there are local bubbles of supersonic flow embedded in the overall airflow. The critical Mach number depends on the configuration of the airplane. The thicker the wing, the more the air accelerates when passing over it. Some of the early WW II fighters, notably the P-38 Lightning, began to run into some transonic aerodynamic effects at Mach numbers as low as 0.68 or 68 percent of the speed of sound. The Komet had a critical Mach number of about 0.84. ![]()
When supersonic flow begins to appear on
a wing or tail surface, the aerodynamic center moves aft, causing a
nose-down pitching moment. As the Mach number increases, a shock wave
forms at the aft boundary of the supersonic-flow bubble. When the shock
gets strong enough it will cause the airflow to separate aft of the shock,
leading to a loss of lift. This condition is called “shock
stall.”
While it was not quite as nasty as the
D.H. 108, the American Northrop X-4 ran into similar difficulties during
flight testing. Later tailless combat aircraft benefited from what had
been learned with the Komet, the Swallow and the X-4. They had thinner
wings and elevons shaped to prevent the loss of control power these
pioneers encountered. —Barnaby Wainfan
| ||||||||||||||||||